A novel dose constraint to reduce xerostomia in head-and-neck cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy
- PMID: 20100642
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1734
A novel dose constraint to reduce xerostomia in head-and-neck cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the predictors of incidence and duration of xerostomia (XT) based on parotid glands (PG), submandibular glands (SMG), and both glands taken as a whole organ (TG) in head-and-neck cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Methods and materials: A prospective study was initiated in May 2003. Sixty-three head-and-neck patients (44 with nasopharynx cancer) were included in the analysis. Using the dose-volume histogram the PG, SMG, and TG mean doses were calculated. Unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow were measured and XT-related questionnaires were compiled before and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after radiotherapy. Salivary gland toxicity was evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale, and Grade >or=3 toxicity was used as the endpoint. The XT incidence was investigated according to descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariate analysis. The Bonferroni method was used for multiple comparison adjustment.
Results: After a reduced flow at 3 months after radiotherapy, recovery of salivary flow was observed over time. Primary site and salivary gland mean doses and volumes were identified in univariate analysis as prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis confirmed that TG mean dose (p = 0.00066) and pretreatment stimulated salivary flow (p = 0.00420) are independent factors for predicting XT.
Conclusion: The TG mean dose correlates with XT as assessed by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria, salivary output, and XT-related questionnaires. Our results suggest that TG mean dose is a candidate dose constraint for reducing XT, requiring considerably more validation in non-nasopharyngeal cancer patients.
Similar articles
-
Analysis of salivary flow and dose-volume modeling of complication incidence in patients with head-and-neck cancer receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Mar 15;73(4):1252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.020. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009. PMID: 19251097
-
Preservation of oral health-related quality of life and salivary flow rates after inverse-planned intensity- modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head-and-neck cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Mar 1;58(3):663-73. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)01571-2. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004. PMID: 14967418 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of salivary gland dosimetry on post-IMRT recovery of saliva output and xerostomia grade for head-and-neck cancer patients treated with or without contralateral submandibular gland sparing: a longitudinal study.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Dec 1;81(5):1479-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.1990. Epub 2010 Oct 8. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011. PMID: 20934262
-
Submandibular gland-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy.Am J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct;37(5):514-6. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318261054e. Am J Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 22892434 Review.
-
Prospective investigation and literature review of tolerance dose on salivary glands using quantitative salivary gland scintigraphy in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era.Head Neck. 2016 Apr;38 Suppl 1:E1746-55. doi: 10.1002/hed.24310. Epub 2016 Feb 15. Head Neck. 2016. PMID: 26875880 Review.
Cited by
-
Practices, knowledge and inter-professional relationships between speech pathologists and radiation therapists managing patients with head and neck cancer.J Med Radiat Sci. 2019 Jun;66(2):103-111. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.332. Epub 2019 Apr 4. J Med Radiat Sci. 2019. PMID: 30950231 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of treatment techniques for reduction in the submandibular gland dose: A retrospective study.J Med Radiat Sci. 2017 Jun;64(2):125-130. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.203. Epub 2017 Feb 27. J Med Radiat Sci. 2017. PMID: 28240447 Free PMC article.
-
Sparing bilateral neck level IB in oropharyngeal carcinoma and xerostomia outcomes.Am J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug;38(4):343-7. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000064. Am J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26208401 Free PMC article.
-
Use dose bricks concept to implement nasopharyngeal carcinoma treatment planning.Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:720876. doi: 10.1155/2014/720876. Epub 2014 May 21. Biomed Res Int. 2014. PMID: 24967395 Free PMC article.
-
The association with xerostomia from sialadenitis and the jaw osteonecrosis in head and neck cancer population: a nationwide cohort study.Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):585-593. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2465-3. Epub 2018 May 3. Clin Oral Investig. 2019. PMID: 29725850
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous