Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol
- PMID: 20100701
- PMCID: PMC2839907
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep452
Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol
Abstract
Background: Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) has been used in an attempt to determine embryonic aneuploidy. Techniques that use new molecular methods to determine the karyotype of an embryo are expanding the scope of PGS.
Methods: We introduce a new method for PGS, termed 'parental support', which leverages microarray measurements from parental DNA to 'clean' single-cell microarray measurements on embryonic cells and explicitly computes confidence in each copy number call. The method distinguishes mitotic and meiotic copy errors and determines parental source of aneuploidy.
Results: Validation with 459 single cells of known karyotype indicated that per-cell false-positive and false-negative rates are roughly equivalent to the 'gold standard' metaphase karyotype. The majority of the cells were run in parallel with a clinical commercial PGS service. Computed confidences were conservative and roughly concordant with accuracy. To examine ploidy in human embryos, the method was then applied to 26 disaggregated, cryopreserved, cleavage-stage embryos for a total of 134 single blastomeres. Only 23.1% of the embryos were euploid, though 46.2% of embryos were mosaic euploid. Mosaicism affected 57.7% of the embryos. Counts of mitotic and meiotic errors were roughly equivalent. Maternal meiotic trisomy predominated over paternal trisomy, and maternal meiotic trisomies were negatively predictive of mosaic euploid embryos.
Conclusions: We have performed a major preclinical validation of a new method for PGS and found that the technology performs approximately as well as a metaphase karyotype. We also directly measured the mechanism of aneuploidy in cleavage-stage human embryos and found high rates and distinct patterns of mitotic and meiotic aneuploidy.
References
-
- Baart EB, Van Opstal D, Los FJ, Fauser BC, Martini E. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of two blastomeres from day 3 frozen-thawed embryos followed by analysis of the remaining embryo on day 5. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:685–693. - PubMed
-
- Baart EB, Martini E, van den Berg I, Macklon NS, Galjaard RJ, Fauser BC, Van Opstal D. Preimplantation genetic screening reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from young women undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:223–233. - PubMed
-
- Baart EB, van den Berg I, Martini E, Eussen HJ, Fauser BC, Van Opstal D. FISH analysis of 15 chromosomes in human day 4 and day 5 preimplantation embryos: the added value of extended aneuploidy detection. Prenat Diagn. 2007;27:55–63. - PubMed
-
- Baltaci V, Satiroglu H, Kabukçu C, Unsal E, Aydinuraz B, Uner O, Aktas Y, Cetinkaya E, Turhan F, Aktan A. Relationship between embryo quality and aneuploidies. Reprod BioMed Online. 2006;12:77–82. - PubMed
-
- Barbash-Hazan S, Frumkin T, Malcov M, Yaron Y, Cohen T, Azem F, Amit A, Ben-Yosef D. Preimplantation aneuploid embryos undergo self-correction in correlation with their developmental potential. Fertil Steril. 2008;92:890–896. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous
