Is it safe to perform endoscopic vein harvest?
- PMID: 20100708
- DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2009.227090
Is it safe to perform endoscopic vein harvest?
Abstract
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: in [patients undergoing coronary revascularisation] is [endoscopic vein harvest] superior to [open harvest] in improving [clinical outcome and cost effectiveness]? Altogether >166 papers were found using the reported search, of which eight represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. All papers agree that endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) reduces the level of postoperative pain (pain score for EVH=0.52+/-0.95; open technique=1.02+/-1.51; P=0.03) and wound complications (range from 3 to 7.4% for EVH and 13 to 19.4% for conventional technique). These clinical benefits were associated with a high level of patient satisfaction. On average, four papers found that the length of hospital stay was reduced in the EVH group [weighted mean difference (WMD) -1.04 to -0.85; confidence interval (CI) -1.92 to -0.16; P=0.02]. The overall occlusion rates of venous grafts after six months were 21.7% for EVH and 17.6% for open technique. There were no differences in the six months occlusion and disease rates between EVH and conventional vein harvest (CVH), as determined by means of univariate analysis (P=0.584). However, some papers (PREVENT-IV sub-analysis and Yun et al.) called into question EVH by reporting high vein occlusion rates. At six months, this was 21.7% for EVH and 17.6% for open technique rising to 46.7% vs. 38.0% (P<0.001) at 12-18 months. At three years, endoscopic harvesting was also associated with higher rates of death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularisation (20.2% vs. 17.4%; P=0.04), death or myocardial infarction (9.3% vs. 7.6%; P=0.01), and death (7.4% vs. 5.8%; P=0.005). We conclude that EVH reduces the level of postoperative pain and wound complication, with a high-level of patient satisfaction but a sub-analysis of a large RCT has recently called into question the medium- to long-term patency of grafts endoscopically harvested.
Comment in
-
eComment: Minimally invasive endoscope-enhanced venous conduit harvesting techniques.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Apr;10(4):629-30. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.227090B. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20335398 No abstract available.
-
eComment: Endoscopic harvesting results in high quality vein and arterial grafts.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Apr;10(4):629. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.227090A. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20335399 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
eComment: Minimally invasive endoscope-enhanced venous conduit harvesting techniques.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Apr;10(4):629-30. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.227090B. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20335398 No abstract available.
-
Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest techniques on outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting.Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Feb;89(2):403-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.09.061. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20103309
-
eComment: Endoscopic harvesting results in high quality vein and arterial grafts.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Apr;10(4):629. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.227090A. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20335399 No abstract available.
-
A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus traditional open vein harvest technique for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Feb;10(2):266-70. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.222430. Epub 2009 Nov 26. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010. PMID: 19942633 Review.
-
Does a 'no-touch' technique result in better vein patency?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Dec;13(6):626-30. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2011.281998. Epub 2011 Sep 10. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011. PMID: 21908888 Review.
Cited by
-
Is endoscopic harvesting bad for saphenous vein graft patency in coronary surgery?Curr Opin Cardiol. 2011 Nov;26(6):518-22. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32834b9f6d. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21986399 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A randomized study comparing three groups of vein harvesting methods for coronary artery bypass grafting: endoscopic harvest versus standard bridging and open techniques.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Aug;15(2):224-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs164. Epub 2012 May 18. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22611182 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Early Outcomes of Endoscopic Vein Harvesting during the Initial Learning Period.Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Jun;48(3):174-9. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.3.174. Epub 2015 Jun 5. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015. PMID: 26078923 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical