Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;23(2):94-9.
doi: 10.1177/0891988709358589. Epub 2010 Jan 25.

The sensitivity and specificity of cognitive screening instruments to detect cognitive impairment in older adults with severe psychiatric illness

R Scott Mackin  1 , Liat Ayalon, Leilani Feliciano, Patricia A Areán
Affiliations

The sensitivity and specificity of cognitive screening instruments to detect cognitive impairment in older adults with severe psychiatric illness

R Scott Mackin et al. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Older adults with severe psychiatric illness are often treated at community mental health centers (CMHCs) and these individuals commonly have numerous risk factors for cognitive impairment (CI). Brief cognitive screening instruments are frequently used to evaluate cognitive functioning in CMHCs, but the validity of these measures for detecting CI has not been adequately evaluated in this patient population.

Objectives: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of 2 cognitive screening measures (the Mini-Mental Status Examination [MMSE] and the Stroop Color and Word Test [SCWT]) for detecting CI in a sample of older adults with severe psychiatric illness.

Methods: Data were collected from 52 older adults receiving services at a CMHC. Diagnosis of CI was made by a neuropsychologist. Sensitivity and specificity coefficients for 2 cutoff scores for the MMSE and the SCWT were calculated.

Results: A cutoff score of 25 on the MMSE yielded a sensitivity of 43.3% and a specificity of 90.4% for detecting CI, whereas a cutoff score of 21 yielded sensitivity of 13.1% and 100% specificity. Using an age- and education-corrected scaled score (SS) on the SCWT falling at or below 7 as the criterion the SCWT had 88.8% sensitivity and 36.8% specificity, whereas a cutoff score of 5 or below yielded sensitivity of 59.2% and specificity of 57.8%.

Conclusions: Overall, the MMSE was found to be the more clinically useful cognitive screening tool for use in CMHC. Yet, because of the poor sensitivity of the MMSE for detecting CI in this patient population, alternative screening methods should be explored.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Segal SP, Hardiman ER, Hodges JQ. Characteristics of new clients at self-help and community mental health agencies in geographic proximity. Psychiatric Services. 2002;53:1145–1152. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Florio ER, Hendryx MS, Jensen JE, Rockwood TH, Raschko R, Dyck DG. A comparison of suicidal and nonsuicidal elders referred to a community mental health center program. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1997;27(2):182–193. - PubMed
    1. Tamkin AS, Dolenz JJ. Cognitive impairment in alcoholics. Percept Mot Skills. 1990;70(3 pt 1):816–818. - PubMed
    1. Black SA, Rush RD. Cognitive and functional decline in adults aged 75 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(12):1978–1986. - PubMed
    1. Stepaniuk J, Ritchie L, Tuokko HA. Neuropsychiatric Impairments as Predictors of Mild Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, and Alzheimer’s Disease. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2008;23(4):326–333. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types