Safety and feasibility of early hospital discharge in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--a prospective and randomized trial in low-risk primary percutaneous coronary intervention patients (the Safe-Depart Trial)
- PMID: 20102876
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.024
Safety and feasibility of early hospital discharge in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--a prospective and randomized trial in low-risk primary percutaneous coronary intervention patients (the Safe-Depart Trial)
Abstract
Background: Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have traditionally been hospitalized for 5 to 7 days to monitor for serious complications such as heart failure, arrhythmias, reinfarction, and death. The Zwolle Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Index is an externally validated risk score that has been used to identify low-risk STEMI patients who have undergone primary PCI and can safely be discharged from hospital within 72 hours. Previous studies have shown that many low-risk patients remain in hospital significantly longer.
Methods: We randomly assigned 54 low-risk STEMI patients treated with primary or rescue PCI to 1 of 2 groups. Patients in the intervention group (n = 27) were actively targeted for early hospital discharge (48-72 hours) and received outpatient follow-up with an advanced practice nurse (APN). In the control group (n = 27), discharge planning and follow-up were left to the treating physician, and there was no added nursing intervention. The 2 primary outcomes of this pilot study were to demonstrate feasibility and safety. Secondary outcomes included compliance with medications, smoking cessation, attendance at cardiac rehabilitation, and quality of life, measured in both groups at 6 weeks time.
Results: In the intervention group, 74% of patients were discharged within 72 hours, 100% had follow-up with the APN within 3 days (74% in person, 26% by phone), and 100% had >/= 3 APN follow-ups in total, meeting our prespecified criteria for feasibility. The median length of stay was 55 hours in both groups. There were no deaths in either group, and there was no difference in rehospitalization between patients in the intervention and control groups (8% vs 4%, P = .56). There was no difference in rates of medication compliance, smoking cessation, attendance at cardiac rehabilitation, or quality of life between the 2 groups, although our small pilot study was not powered to detect a difference in these outcomes.
Conclusion: In low-risk STEMI patients treated with primary or rescue PCI, a strategy of early hospital discharge facilitated by close nursing follow-up is feasible. Although our study did not identify differences in compliance or quality of life between the 2 groups, it did provide a functional study design for a larger trial powered to detect these important clinical end points.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00474214.
Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Prospective multicenter randomized trial comparing physician versus patient transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Mar 20;121(6):485-91. Chin Med J (Engl). 2008. PMID: 18364130 Clinical Trial.
-
Outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients aged over 75 years.Chin Med J (Engl). 2006 Jul 20;119(14):1151-6. Chin Med J (Engl). 2006. PMID: 16863605 Clinical Trial.
-
Early reperfusion and late clinical outcomes in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction randomly assigned to primary percutaneous coronary intervention or streptokinase.Am Heart J. 2003 Dec;146(6):E22. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00424-1. Am Heart J. 2003. PMID: 14661011 Clinical Trial.
-
Emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the care of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).Minerva Cardioangiol. 2007 Oct;55(5):593-623. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2007. PMID: 17912165 Review.
-
Adjunctive devices in primary or rescue PCI: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.Int J Cardiol. 2008 Jan 24;123(3):313-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.12.018. Epub 2007 Mar 26. Int J Cardiol. 2008. PMID: 17383756 Review.
Cited by
-
A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists: what is the quality of the evidence?Nurs Res Pract. 2014;2014:896587. doi: 10.1155/2014/896587. Epub 2014 Sep 1. Nurs Res Pract. 2014. PMID: 25258683 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Psychosocial interventions for smoking cessation in patients with coronary heart disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 6;2015(7):CD006886. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006886.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26148115 Free PMC article.
-
Providing optimal regional care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective cohort study of patients in the Hamilton Niagara Haldimand Brant Local Health Integration Network.CMAJ Open. 2015 Jan 13;3(1):E1-7. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20140035. eCollection 2015 Jan-Mar. CMAJ Open. 2015. PMID: 25844361 Free PMC article.
-
Healthcare provider-led interventions to support medication adherence following ACS: a meta-analysis.Open Heart. 2017 Dec 22;4(2):e000685. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000685. eCollection 2017. Open Heart. 2017. PMID: 29344366 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Early discharge compared with ordinary discharge after percutaneous coronary intervention - a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and cost.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017 Mar 20;13:101-109. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S122951. eCollection 2017. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017. PMID: 28356750 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous