Time-dependent risk of Fidelis lead failure
- PMID: 20102898
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.08.655
Time-dependent risk of Fidelis lead failure
Abstract
The Medtronic Sprint Fidelis leads (models 6930, 6931, 6948, 6949) are 6.6-F bipolar high-voltage implantable cardioverter-defibrillator electrodes that were first introduced in September 2004. In October 2007, Fidelis leads were removed from the market. We sought to determine the time-dependent hazard of the Fidelis failure rate to date. A retrospective chart review was conducted in all patients who underwent implantation of a Sprint Fidelis lead (426 leads) at our center. We primarily implanted models 6931 and 6949. With 1,056 years of combined follow-up (average 2.3 +/- 1), 38 of 426 (8.92%) Sprint Fidelis leads failed (3.6%/year). The hazard of fracture increased exponentially over time by a power of 2.13 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.98 to 2.27, p <0.001) and the 3-year survival was 90.8% (95% CI 87.4 to 94.3). If a Fidelis lead was functioning normally at 1 year, the chance it would survive another year was 97.4% (95% CI 95.7 to 99.1); if functioning at 2 years, the chance of surviving another year was 94.7% (95% CI 91.8 to 97.7); and if functioning at 3 years, the chance of surviving 1 more year was 86.7% (95% CI 78.8 to 95.5). Other commonly used implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads showed no evidence of increased failure rates. In conclusion, to date, the hazard of Fidelis lead fracture is increasing exponentially with time and, based on our data, occurring at a higher rate than the latest manufacturer's performance update. Further accumulative data are needed because it remains unknown if the fracture rate will level off or continue to increase.
Similar articles
-
Risk of Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead failure is highly dependent on age.Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 Jun-Jul;104(6-7):388-95. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 Jul 8. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011. PMID: 21798471
-
Risk factors for implantable defibrillator lead fracture in a recalled and a nonrecalled lead.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Jun 1;21(6):671-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01683.x. Epub 2010 Jan 15. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010. PMID: 20082653
-
Trends in Fidelis lead survival: transition from an exponential to linear pattern of lead failure over time.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Oct;5(5):906-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.112.972000. Epub 2012 Aug 23. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012. PMID: 22923271
-
Increasing hazard of Sprint Fidelis implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead failure.Heart Rhythm. 2009 May;6(5):605-10. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.02.024. Epub 2009 Feb 20. Heart Rhythm. 2009. PMID: 19285920
-
The National ICD Registry Report: version 2.1 including leads and pediatrics for years 2010 and 2011.Heart Rhythm. 2013 Apr;10(4):e59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.01.035. Epub 2013 Feb 9. Heart Rhythm. 2013. PMID: 23403056 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
First time description of early lead failure of the Linox Smart lead compared to other contemporary high-voltage leads.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Jul;52(2):173-177. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0372-9. Epub 2018 May 1. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018. PMID: 29713860
-
Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in Brugada syndrome: Pattern in primary and secondary prevention.Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2017 Jan-Feb;17(1):10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Oct 24. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2017. PMID: 28401854 Free PMC article.
-
Natural history of the Sprint Fidelis lead: survival analysis from a large single-center study.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012 Jun;34(1):37-44. doi: 10.1007/s10840-011-9647-0. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012. PMID: 22314669 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of fracture-prone implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads on long-term patient mortality.J Arrhythm. 2023 Mar 26;39(3):454-463. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12843. eCollection 2023 Jun. J Arrhythm. 2023. PMID: 37324755 Free PMC article.
-
Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Lead Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Oct 30;4(11):e002418. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002418. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015. PMID: 26518666 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical