Intrauterine contraception in Saint Louis: a survey of obstetrician and gynecologists' knowledge and attitudes
- PMID: 20103447
- PMCID: PMC2813209
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.08.002
Intrauterine contraception in Saint Louis: a survey of obstetrician and gynecologists' knowledge and attitudes
Abstract
Background: Many obstacles to intrauterine contraception (IUC) use exist, including provider and patient misinformation, high upfront cost and clinician practice patterns. The aim of our study was to investigate knowledge and attitudes about IUC among obstetricians and gynecologists in the area of Saint Louis.
Study design: We mailed a self-administered, anonymous survey to 250 clinicians who provide obstetric and gynecologic care in Saint Louis City and County which included questions about demographics, training, family planning visits and intrauterine contraceptive knowledge and use.
Results: The overall survey response rate among eligible clinicians was 73.7%. Clinicians who had recently finished training or saw higher numbers of contraceptive patients per week were more likely to insert IUC than clinicians who completed training prior to 1989 or saw fewer contraceptive patients. Several misconceptions among clinicians were identified, including an association between intrauterine contraceptives and an elevated risk of pelvic inflammatory disease.
Conclusions: Physician misconceptions about the risks of IUC continue to occur. Improved clinician education is greatly needed to facilitate the use of these highly effective, long-acting, reversible methods of contraception.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Obstetrician-gynecologists and contraception: long-acting reversible contraception practices and education.Contraception. 2014 Jun;89(6):578-83. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 18. Contraception. 2014. PMID: 24656553
-
Improving Physician Knowledge: A Necessary but Not Sufficient Requirement of Improving Intrauterine Contraception Access in Canada.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Aug;41(8):1115-1124. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.11.005. Epub 2019 Feb 23. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019. PMID: 30803875
-
Long-acting reversible contraception knowledge, attitudes and use among HIV-infected and -uninfected women and their providers.Contraception. 2019 Oct;100(4):269-274. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jun 18. Contraception. 2019. PMID: 31226320
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
-
Consensus of best practice in intrauterine contraception in France.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019 Aug;24(4):305-313. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1625325. Epub 2019 Jun 17. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019. PMID: 31204843 Review.
Cited by
-
Knowledge and Training of Intrauterine Devices Among Primary Care Residents: Implications for Graduate Medical Education.J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Mar;7(1):9-11. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00010.1. J Grad Med Educ. 2015. PMID: 26217412 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Evidence-based selection of candidates for the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD).J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Jan-Feb;27(1):26-33. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.01.130142. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014. PMID: 24390883 Free PMC article.
-
Clinicians' knowledge and practices regarding family planning and intrauterine devices in China, Kazakhstan, Laos and Mexico.Reprod Health. 2016 Jun 10;13(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0185-1. Reprod Health. 2016. PMID: 27283191 Free PMC article.
-
The Affordable Care Act contraception mandate & unintended pregnancy in women of reproductive age: An analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth, 2008-2010 v. 2013-2015.Contraception. 2020 Jan;101(1):34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Oct 23. Contraception. 2020. PMID: 31655071 Free PMC article.
-
The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: recruiting women at highest risk for unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Dec;19(12):2233-8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2146. Epub 2010 Sep 11. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010. PMID: 20831439 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006;38:90–96. - PubMed
-
- Trussell J. Contraceptive Efficacy. In: Hatcher RATJ, Nelson AL, Cates W, Stewart FH, Kowal D, editors. Contraceptive Technology. New York (NY): Ardent Media; 2007. pp. 747–760.
-
- Suhonen S, Haukkamaa M, Jakobsson T, Rauramo I. Clinical performance of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and oral contraceptives in young nulliparous women: a comparative study. Contraception. 2004;69:407–412. - PubMed
-
- Baldaszti E, Wimmer B, Loschke K. Acceptability of the long-term contraceptive levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena): a 3-year follow-up study. Contraception. 2003;67:87–91. - PubMed
-
- Ortayli N, Bulut A, Sahin T, Sivin I. Immediate postabortal contraception with the levonorgestrel intrauterine device, Norplant, and traditional methods. Contraception. 2001;63:309–314. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical