Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography
- PMID: 20105090
- DOI: 10.3109/02841850903524447
Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography
Abstract
Background: Mammographic tumor size measurement can be difficult because breast structures are superimposed onto a two-dimensional (2D) plane, potentially obscuring the tumor outline. Breast tomosynthesis (BT) is a 3D X-ray imaging technique in which low-dose images are acquired over a limited angular range at a total dose comparable to digital mammography (DM). These low-dose images are used to mathematically reconstruct a 3D image volume of the breast, thus reducing the problem of superimposed tissue.
Purpose: To investigate whether breast cancer size can be more accurately assessed with breast tomosynthesis than with digital mammography and ultrasonography (US), by reducing the disturbance effect of the projected anatomy.
Material and methods: A prototype BT system was used. The main inclusion criterion for BT examination was subtle but suspicious findings of breast cancer on 2D mammography. Sixty-two women with 73 breast cancers were included. BT, DM, and US sizes were measured independently by experienced radiologists without knowledge of the pathology results, which were used as reference.
Results: The tumor outline could be determined in significantly more cases with BT (63) and US (60) than DM (49). BT and US size correlated well with pathology (R=0.86 and R=0.85, respectively), and significantly better than DM size (R=0.71). Accordingly, staging was significantly more accurate with BT than with DM.
Conclusion: The study indicates that BT is superior to DM in the assessment of breast tumor size and stage.
Similar articles
-
A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.Med Phys. 2006 Apr;33(4):1041-52. doi: 10.1118/1.2174127. Med Phys. 2006. PMID: 16696481
-
Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.Acta Radiol. 2014 Jul;55(6):661-7. doi: 10.1177/0284185113503636. Epub 2013 Sep 4. Acta Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24005560
-
Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings.Eur Radiol. 2008 Dec;18(12):2817-25. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1076-9. Epub 2008 Jul 19. Eur Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18641998
-
Overview of digital breast tomosynthesis: Clinical cases, benefits and disadvantages.Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015 Sep;96(9):843-59. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Aug 11. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015. PMID: 26275829 Review.
-
Digital tomosynthesis: a new future for breast imaging?Clin Radiol. 2013 May;68(5):e225-36. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Mar 5. Clin Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23465326 Review.
Cited by
-
Correlation of contrast agent kinetics between iodinated contrast-enhanced spectral tomosynthesis and gadolinium-enhanced MRI of breast lesions.Eur Radiol. 2013 Jun;23(6):1528-36. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2742-5. Epub 2013 Jan 10. Eur Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23306708
-
Molecular imaging of breast cancer: present and future directions.Front Chem. 2014 Dec 18;2:112. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2014.00112. eCollection 2014. Front Chem. 2014. PMID: 25566530 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) in assessing breast cancer size: A comparison with conventional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.Eur Radiol. 2018 Mar;28(3):1000-1008. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5074-7. Epub 2017 Oct 10. Eur Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29018952
-
Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis for microcalcifications and margins to microcalcifications in breast specimens.Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 21;12(1):17639. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21616-3. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36271228 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of ABUS in The Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.J Ultrason. 2022 Apr 27;22(89):76-85. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2022.0014. eCollection 2022 Apr. J Ultrason. 2022. PMID: 35811591 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical