Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Jan;71(1):23-31.
doi: 10.15288/jsad.2010.71.23.

Brief physician advice for heavy drinking college students: a randomized controlled trial in college health clinics

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Brief physician advice for heavy drinking college students: a randomized controlled trial in college health clinics

Michael F Fleming et al. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of brief physician advice in reducing alcohol use and related harm in college students.

Method: The College Health Intervention Projects (CHIPs) is a randomized, controlled clinical trial with 12-month follow-up conducted in five college health clinics in Wisconsin; Washington state; and Vancouver, Canada. Of the 12,900 students screened for high-risk drinking, 484 men and 502 women met inclusion criteria and were randomized into a control (n = 493) or intervention (n = 493) group. Ninety-six percent of students participated in the follow-up procedures. The intervention consisted of two 15-minute counseling visits and two follow-up phone calls, and used motivational interviewing, contracting, diary cards, and take-home exercises.

Results: No significant differences were found between groups at baseline on alcohol use, age, socioeconomic or smoking status, rates of depression, or measures of alcohol-related harm. At 12 months, the experimental subjects reduced their 28-day drinking totals by 27.2%, and the control group reduced their totals by 21%. A mixed effects repeated measures model found a statistical difference in favor of the brief-intervention group (beta = 4.7, SE = 2.0, p = .018) in 28-day drinking totals. The total Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index score was also significantly different during the 12-month follow-up period (beta = 0.8, SE = 0.4, p = .033). There was no difference on the other outcome measures of interest, such as frequency of excessive heavy drinking, health care utilization, injuries, drunk driving, depression, or tobacco use.

Conclusions: The study supports resource allocation and implementation of alcohol screening and brief physician advice in primary care-based college health clinics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abby A. Alcohol related sexual assault: A common problem among college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 2002;(Supplement No. 14):118–128. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd ed., rev. Washington, DC: Author; 1987.
    1. Babor TF, Stephens RS, Marlatt GA. Verbal report methods in clinical research on alcoholism. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1987;48:410–424. - PubMed
    1. Beck AT, Guth D, Steer RA, Ball R. Screening for major depression disorders in medical inpatients with the Beck Depression Inventory for Primary Care. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1997;35:785–791. - PubMed
    1. Bertholet N, Daeppen J-B, Wietlisbach V, Fleming MF, Burnand B. Reduction of alcohol consumption by brief alcohol intervention in primary care. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2005;165:986–995. - PubMed

Publication types