Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jan;45(1):100-7; discussion 107.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.10.019.

Outcomes in children with intestinal failure following listing for intestinal transplant

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Outcomes in children with intestinal failure following listing for intestinal transplant

Oliver B Lao et al. J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the population of pediatric patients waiting for intestinal transplant and to evaluate the risk of death or transplant by specific disease states.

Methods: We studied the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database (Jan 1,1991 to 5/16/08) for patients 21 years old or younger at first listing for intestinal transplant and examined their age, sex, weight, and diagnoses. Time to list removal was summarized with cumulative incidence curves. Multinomial logistic regression was used to compare relative risk ratios for removal from the list for transplant, death, or other reasons.

Results: We identified 1712 children listed for intestinal transplant (57% male, 51% <1 year, weight 8.1 kg [IQR, 6.1-14.1] at listing). Median age and weight at transplant (n = 852) were 1 year (IQR, 1-5) and 10 kg (IQR, 6.5-16.3). Regression analysis demonstrated significant differences in outcomes among disease conditions (P < .001). Compared to the gastroschisis group, the relative risk ratio for death versus transplant was higher in the necrotizing enterocolitis group (P = .015), lower in the short gut syndrome group (P = .001), and not different in the volvulus group (P = .94) after adjustment for weight and sex.

Conclusions: We conclude that the relative risk of transplant vs death varies significantly by the disease condition of the patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study subject selection outline from UNOS database. (≤21 years-old at listing)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative incidence curves from time of listing for intestinal transplant to removal from list for the four most common diagnostic categories.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grant D. Intestinal transplantation: 1997 report of the international registry. Intestinal Transplant Registry. Transplantation. 1999;67(7):1061–4. - PubMed
    1. Grant D, Abu-Elmagd K, Reyes J, et al. 2003 report of the intestine transplant registry: a new era has dawned. Ann Surg. 2005;241(4):607–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harmon WE, McDonald RA, Reyes JD, et al. Pediatric transplantation, 1994–2003. Am J Transplant. 2005;5(4 Pt 2):887–903. - PubMed
    1. Fryer JP. Intestinal transplantation: an update. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2005;21(2):162–8. - PubMed
    1. Kaufman SS. Small bowel transplantation: selection criteria, operative techniques, advances in specific immunosuppression, prognosis. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2001;13(5):425–8. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms