A pediatric acute wound service: a novel approach in wound management

Abstract

Introduction: In 2001, in response to an overwhelming increase in patient visits for various pediatric abscesses, burns, and other wounds, an ambulatory burn and procedural sedation program (Pediatric Acute Wound Service, or PAWS) was developed to minimize operating room utilization. The purpose of this study is to report our initial 7-year experience with the PAWS program.

Methods: The hospital records of all children managed through PAWS from 2001 to 2007 were reviewed. Outcomes measured include patient demographics, number and location of visits per patient, procedure information, cause of wounds, and reimbursement. chi(2) test and linear regression were performed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc, San Diego, CA).

Results: Overall, 7620 children (age 0-18 years) received wound care through PAWS from 2001 to 2007. There were no differences in patient age, race, and sex during this time period. Between 2001 and 2007, the percentage of patients seen as outpatients increased from 51% to 68% (P < .05), and the average number of visits per patient decreased from 3.9 to 2.4 (P = .05). In, 2007, 46% of the children required only 1 visit. In 2007, 74% of the visits were for management of wound and soft tissue infections, compared with only 9% in 2001 (P < .05). The contribution margin of a PAWS visit and total contribution margin in 2007 were $1052 and $4.0 million, respectively.

Conclusion: The creation of PAWS has allowed for the transition in management of most pediatric skin and soft tissue wounds and infections to an independent ambulatory setting, alleviating the need for operating room resources, while functioning at a profitable cost margin for the hospital.

Figure 1

Yearly trend in the number of patient and patient visits in the PAWS Clinic from 2001-2007. (A) Number of patients seen in PAWS clinic yearly divided in to inpatients (checkered) and outpatients (bar). (B) Number of patient visits in PAWS clinic yearly divided into visits related to burn wounds (checkered) or non-burn wounds (bar). P<0.05 for trend by Linear Regression.