Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis
- PMID: 20105674
- DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60206-7
Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis
Abstract
Statement of problem: Previous research into the strength of endodontically treated or vital teeth restored with inlays or onlays has not determined which restoration method and material provide the most favorable stress distribution upon loading.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to calculate the von Mises stresses in a mandibular first molar using a 3-dimensional (3-D) finite element model. Models compared endodontically treated and vital teeth, a variety of restorative materials, and the use of either inlays or onlays to restore teeth.
Material and methods: Four 3-D models of mandibular first molars were created: (1) the IV group (inlay restored, vital pulp); (2) the OV group (onlay restored, vital pulp); (3) the IE group (inlay restored, endodontically treated); and (4) the OE group (onlay restored, endodontically treated). In each group, 3 types of restorative material were tested: (1) composite resin, (2) ceramic, and (3) gold alloy. The materials had elastic moduli of 19 GPa, 65 GPa, and 96.6 GPa, respectively. Each model was subjected to a force of 45 N directed to the occlusal surface, applied either vertically or laterally (45 degrees obliquely). The stresses occurring in dentin tissue were calculated. The stress distribution patterns and the maximum von Mises stresses were calculated and compared.
Results: The different restorative materials exhibited similar stress distribution patterns under identical loading conditions. In each group, the gold-restored tooth exhibited the highest von Mises stress, followed by ceramic and composite resin. The maximum von Mises stress in dentin was found in the IE group (16.73 MPa), which was 5 times higher than the highest value found in the OV group (2.96 MPa). The highest stresses, which occurred at the floor of the preparation and the cervical region in dentin, were in the IE group. The stress concentration area in the IE group was also larger.
Conclusions: The results indicate that endodontic treatment caused higher stress concentration in dentin compared with vital teeth, but that proper restoration can minimize internal stresses. In the models, the von Mises stress values increased with the increasing elastic modulus of the restorative material. Composite resin onlays showed the best performance overall in minimizing internal stresses. As internal stresses are indicated as a prime failure mechanism of the restoration, composite resin onlays are expected to better restore structural integrity.
Copyright 2010 The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Feb;99(2):131-40. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60029-3. J Prosthet Dent. 2008. PMID: 18262014
-
Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure.Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Dec;23(6):543-55. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003. PMID: 14703758
-
Virtual prototyping of adhesively restored, endodontically treated molars.J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Jun;103(6):343-51. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60074-1. J Prosthet Dent. 2010. PMID: 20493323
-
Complications and survival rates of inlays and onlays vs complete coverage restorations: A systematic review and analysis of studies.J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Nov;45(11):903-920. doi: 10.1111/joor.12695. Epub 2018 Aug 13. J Oral Rehabil. 2018. PMID: 30019391
-
Aesthetic inlays: composite or ceramic?Br Dent J. 1994 Jan 22;176(2):53-60. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808363. Br Dent J. 1994. PMID: 8117475 Review.
Cited by
-
Influence of cavity design preparation on stress values in maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis.Croat Med J. 2012 Dec;53(6):568-76. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.568. Croat Med J. 2012. PMID: 23275322 Free PMC article.
-
Base Materials' Influence on Fracture Resistance of Molars with MOD Cavities.Materials (Basel). 2021 Sep 12;14(18):5242. doi: 10.3390/ma14185242. Materials (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34576466 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of the volume of restorative material on the concentration of stresses in the restorative interface.J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Jun 1;13(6):e558-e563. doi: 10.4317/jced.57781. eCollection 2021 Jun. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021. PMID: 34188761 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Direct and Indirect Materials on Stress Distribution in Class II MOD Restorations: A 3D-Finite Element Analysis Study.Biomed Res Int. 2020 Dec 15;2020:7435054. doi: 10.1155/2020/7435054. eCollection 2020. Biomed Res Int. 2020. PMID: 33381580 Free PMC article.
-
Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth with cervical defects using different restorative treatments.J Dent Sci. 2022 Apr;17(2):842-847. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2021.09.017. Epub 2021 Oct 8. J Dent Sci. 2022. PMID: 35756765 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials