Morbidity of oral mucosa graft harvesting from a single cheek
- PMID: 20106587
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.01.012
Morbidity of oral mucosa graft harvesting from a single cheek
Abstract
Background: The oral mucosa (OM) is a popular substitute for urethroplasty.
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate oral morbidity and patient satisfaction in a homogeneous group of patients who underwent OM harvesting.
Design, setting, and participants: This study is a prospective analysis of 350 patients who underwent OM harvesting from a single cheek.
Intervention: The graft was harvested in an ovoid shape with closure of the wound. Standard graft size was 4 cm in length and 2.5 cm in width.
Measurements: Self-administered, nonvalidated semiquantitative (0, absence of complications or symptoms; 3, the worst complication or symptom) questionnaire consisting of six questions was used to investigate early complications, with 13 questions designed to investigate late complications and patient satisfaction.
Results and limitations: Early complications included bleeding, which occurred in 15 patients (4.3%); two patients required immediate surgical revision of the harvesting site. The majority of patients (85.2%) showed no pain, and only 3.7% of patients required use of anti-inflammatory drugs. The majority of patients (65.8%) showed slight or moderate swelling. With respect to late complications, most of the patients (73.4%) reported oral numbness for 1 wk, 22.9% for 1 mo, and 3.77% for 3 mo. Numbness resulting from scarring was absent or slight in most of patients. Changes in oral sensitivity occurred in 2.3% of patients. No difficulties opening the mouth or smiling was found in 98.3% and 99.7% of patients, respectively. Slight or moderate dry mouth was found in 97.1% of patients. In response to the question, "Would you undergo oral mucosa graft harvesting using this technique again," 343 patients (98%) replied "yes," and 7 patients (2%) replied "no."
Conclusions: The harvesting of an OM ovoid graft from a cheek with closure of the wound is a safe procedure with a high patient satisfaction rate.
Copyright 2010 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Anterior urethral surgery: current concepts and future directions.Eur Urol. 2010 Jul;58(1):42-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.022. Epub 2010 Feb 20. Eur Urol. 2010. PMID: 20193977 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
