A proposed method to adjust for selection bias in cohort studies
- PMID: 20106936
- DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp432
A proposed method to adjust for selection bias in cohort studies
Abstract
Selection bias is a concern in cohort studies in which selection into the cohort is related to the studied outcome. An example is chronic infection with hepatitis C virus, where the initial infection may be asymptomatic for decades. This problem leads to selection of more severely ill individuals into registers of such infections. Cohort studies often adjust for this bias by introducing a time window between entry into the cohort and entry into the study. This paper describes and assesses a novel method to improve adjustment for this type of selection bias. The size of the time window is decided by calculating a standardized incidence ratio as a continuous function of the size of the time window. The resulting graph is used to decide on an appropriate window size. The method is evaluated by using the Swedish register of hepatitis C virus infections for 1990-2006. The complications studied were non-Hodgkin lymphoma and liver cancer. Selection bias differed for the studied outcomes, and a time window of a minimum of 2 months and 12 months, respectively, was judged to be appropriate. The novel method may have advantages compared with an interval-based method, especially in cohort studies with small numbers of events.
Similar articles
-
A method to visualize and adjust for selection bias in prevalent cohort studies.Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Oct 15;174(8):969-76. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr211. Epub 2011 Sep 13. Am J Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21920949
-
Immortal time bias in pharmaco-epidemiology.Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Feb 15;167(4):492-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm324. Epub 2007 Dec 3. Am J Epidemiol. 2008. PMID: 18056625 Review.
-
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and other nonhepatic malignancies in Swedish patients with hepatitis C virus infection.Hepatology. 2005 Mar;41(3):652-9. doi: 10.1002/hep.20608. Hepatology. 2005. PMID: 15723449
-
Self-selection and bias in a large prospective pregnancy cohort in Norway.Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009 Nov;23(6):597-608. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2009.01062.x. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009. PMID: 19840297
-
The risk of lymphoma development in autoimmune diseases: a meta-analysis.Arch Intern Med. 2005 Nov 14;165(20):2337-44. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.20.2337. Arch Intern Med. 2005. PMID: 16287762 Review.
Cited by
-
Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors versus Other Antidiabetic Drugs Added to Metformin Monotherapy in Diabetic Retinopathy Progression: A Real World-Based Cohort Study.Diabetes Metab J. 2019 Oct;43(5):640-648. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2018.0137. Epub 2019 Feb 20. Diabetes Metab J. 2019. PMID: 30877707 Free PMC article.
-
Mortality among British Columbians testing for hepatitis C antibody.BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 2;13:291. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-291. BMC Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23547940 Free PMC article.
-
Stroke Rate Increases Around the Time of Cancer Diagnosis.Front Neurol. 2019 Jun 7;10:579. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00579. eCollection 2019. Front Neurol. 2019. PMID: 31231302 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the first wave of epidemiological studies of nanomaterial workers.J Nanopart Res. 2015 Oct;17:413. doi: 10.1007/s11051-015-3219-7. Epub 2015 Oct 19. J Nanopart Res. 2015. PMID: 26635494 Free PMC article.
-
Longitudinal follow-up of health effects among workers handling engineered nanomaterials: a panel study.Environ Health. 2019 Dec 9;18(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12940-019-0542-y. Environ Health. 2019. PMID: 31818305 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources