Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;91(3):662-71.
doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28750. Epub 2010 Jan 27.

Adiposity is inversely related to insulin sensitivity in relatively lean Chinese adolescents: a population-based twin study

Affiliations

Adiposity is inversely related to insulin sensitivity in relatively lean Chinese adolescents: a population-based twin study

Fengxiu Ouyang et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Adolescence is a critical period for rising adiposity and falling insulin sensitivity (IS), but the independent relation between adiposity and IS remains understudied.

Objective: The objective was to examine which adiposity measures are most strongly associated with IS in nondiabetic adolescents, whether sex-difference exists, and to what degree genetic or environmental factors affect the adiposity-IS relation.

Design: The study included 1613 rural Chinese adolescents (888 males) aged 13-20 y from a population-based twin cohort. We used graphic plots and linear mixed models to examine the relation of anthropometric and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based measures of adiposity with IS [QUantitative Insulin-sensitivity ChecK Index (QUICKI), fasting serum insulin (FSI), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)] and structural equation models to estimate genetic/environmental influences on these associations.

Results: In graphic analyses, participants in the highest quintile (quintile 5) of waist circumference (WC) and percentage body fat (%BF) had the lowest QUICKI and the highest FSI and HOMA-IR values for all age-sex groups. In regression models adjusted for age, Tanner stage, zygosity, and physical activity, all adiposity measures showed inverse associations with IS in both sexes, but WC explained the largest fraction of variance in IS measures (10-14%). Of the phenotypic correlations between adiposity measures and IS (-0.28 to -0.38), 74-85% were attributed to shared genetic factors and 15-26% to common unique environmental factors in both sexes.

Conclusions: In these relatively lean Chinese adolescents, WC and %BF (quintile 5) are the adiposity measures most consistently and strongly associated with decreased IS in both sexes. To a large degree, shared genetic factors contribute to this association.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Smoothing plots of QUantitative Insulin-sensitivity ChecK Index (QUICKI) by age, stratified by each 1-y age group and sex-specific quintiles (Q1–Q5) of adiposity measures in 888 males and 725 females aged 13–20 y. %BF, percentage body fat; WC, waist circumference; %TF, percentage trunk fat.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Estimates of genetic (rG) and environmental (rE) correlations between adiposity measures [BMI, percentage body fat (%BF), and waist circumference (WC)] and insulin sensitivity [IS, estimated by QUantitative Insulin-sensitivity ChecK Index (QUICKI)] in males and females. Age, Tanner stage, and physical activity were adjusted as covariates in all bivariate structural equation modeling. rG, genetic correlation between 2 phenotypes; rC, common environmental correlation; rE, unique environmental correlation between 2 phenotypes; CGCP, CCCP, and CUCP, genetic, common environmental, and unique environmental contribution to the correlation between 2 phenotypes, respectively; rTP, phenotype correlation between IS and adiposity measures. formula image The genetic (A), common environment (C), and individual specific environment (E) components for each phenotype were similar to those from univariate genetic models, but they were not identical because bivariate analysis included covariance between the 2 variables examined.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ebbeling CB, Pawlak DB, Ludwig DS. Childhood obesity: public-health crisis, common sense cure. Lancet 2002;360:473–82 - PubMed
    1. MacKay AP, Duran C. Adolescent health in the United States, 2007. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Health Statistics, 2007
    1. Fagot-Campagna A, Pettitt DJ, Engelgau MM, et al. Type 2 diabetes among North American children and adolescents: an epidemiologic review and a public health perspective. J Pediatr 2000;136:664–72 - PubMed
    1. Ji CY. The prevalence of childhood overweight/obesity and the epidemic changes in 1985-2000 for Chinese school-age children and adolescents. Obes Rev 2008;9(suppl 1):78–81 - PubMed
    1. Morrison JA, Barton BA, Biro FM, Daniels SR, Sprecher DL. Overweight, fat patterning, and cardiovascular disease risk factors in black and white boys. J Pediatr 1999;135:451–7 - PubMed

Publication types