Effects of β-blockers and anxiety on complication rates after acute myocardial infarction
- PMID: 20107234
- DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2010216
Effects of β-blockers and anxiety on complication rates after acute myocardial infarction
Abstract
Background: Anxiety is common after acute myocardial infarction and increases the number of complications and the length of stay in the hospital. Anxiety-induced activation of the sympathetic nervous system is hypothesized to be an underlying cause of increased complication rates. Little is known about whether use of β-blockers eliminates the effects of anxiety on complication rate and length of stay.
Objective: To compare number of complications and length of stay among nonanxious and anxious patients receiving β-blockers during hospitalization.
Method: A total of 322 patients with acute myocardial infarction participated in this study within 48 hours of hospital admission. Patients completed the Brief Symptom Inventory to assess anxiety level. After discharge, medical records were reviewed to determine use of β-blockers, type and number of complications, and length of stay.
Results: Most patients (96%) were treated with less than 200 mg daily of metoprolol. Anxious patients had more complications (mean [SD], 1.43 [0.15] vs 0.73 [.09], P ≤ .01) and longer stays (7.0 [0.49] vs 5.7 [0.36] days, P < .05) than did nonanxious patients. To test whether the dose of β-blocker made a difference, the interaction between daily dose and anxiety score was tested. No interaction was found between metoprolol dose and anxiety score, and no main effect was found for metoprolol dose.
Conclusion: Anxious patients had more complications and longer stays than did nonanxious patients. The administration of metoprolol did not eliminate this relationship, perhaps because patients did not receive a sufficient dose of metoprolol to counter the effect of anxiety.
Similar articles
-
Clinical impact of local implementation of agreed guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction.G Ital Cardiol. 1999 Jan;29(1):39-47. G Ital Cardiol. 1999. PMID: 9987046
-
Depression but not anxiety influences the autonomic control of heart rate after myocardial infarction.Am Heart J. 2001 May;141(5):765-71. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.114806. Am Heart J. 2001. PMID: 11320364
-
Treatment with beta-adrenergic blocking agents after myocardial infarction: from randomized trials to clinical practice.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 May;25(6):1327-32. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00552-2. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995. PMID: 7722129
-
Beta-adrenergic blockers in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Cardiovasc Clin. 1989;20(1):235-48. Cardiovasc Clin. 1989. PMID: 2565768 Review.
-
Beta blockers in acute myocardial infarction.Indian Heart J. 2010 Mar-Apr;62(2):148-53. Indian Heart J. 2010. PMID: 21180308 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Perceived control moderates the relationship between anxiety and in-hospital complications after ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Jul 27;11:359-365. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S170326. eCollection 2018. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018. PMID: 30100731 Free PMC article.
-
Whole body massage for reducing anxiety and stabilizing vital signs of patients in cardiac care unit.Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2014 Jun 17;28:47. eCollection 2014. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2014. PMID: 25405113 Free PMC article.
-
Patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: moderating effect of perceived control on the relationship between depression and in-hospital complications.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1126-z. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019. PMID: 31195992 Free PMC article.
-
Anxiety and prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis.Clin Cardiol. 2021 Jun;44(6):761-770. doi: 10.1002/clc.23605. Epub 2021 May 7. Clin Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 33960435 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Effect of Whole Body Massage on the Process and Physiological Outcome of Trauma ICU Patients: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jun;9(6):UC05-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12756.6096. Epub 2015 Jun 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015. PMID: 26266191 Free PMC article.