The orbscan acoustic (correction) factor for central corneal thickness measures of normal human corneas
- PMID: 20107419
- DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181d0b604
The orbscan acoustic (correction) factor for central corneal thickness measures of normal human corneas
Abstract
Background: Orbscan scanning-slit optical pachymetry was introduced over a decade ago and yielded higher central corneal thickness (CCT) values to the "gold standard" of contact ultrasound pachymetry (U/S). An acoustic correction factor (AF) was introduced later to compensate for this difference. The goal of this review was to assess the magnitude and consistency of the difference, as well as to assess how useful the AF had been.
Methods: Using PubMed (Medline)-sourced citations, published articles were identified that included data on CCT from U/S and Orbscan, with the latter data checked to see whether an AF had been applied. Main comparisons were made between (1) Orbscan data without AF and U/S, and (2) Orbscan data with a 0.92 AF applied and the U/S data.
Results: From 46 studies involving a total of 6136 eyes (average number per study of 133, range 6-1214), the average CCT values by U/S ranged from 0.520 to 0.580, for a group mean of 0.545 mm. For Orbscan without AF, the average CCT values ranged from 0.557 to 0.624 mm, for a mean of 0.582 mm, a net difference of 0.037 mm from U/S, with all Orbscan data (average values from any particular study) being higher than U/S. With a 0.92 AF applied, the net difference was -0.009 mm. The calculated limits of agreement between the two methods ranged from 0.004 to 0.073 without AF, but from -0.041 to + 0.023 mm with the AF. The overall outcome was essentially the same if weighted for cohort size and sample variability, or if only studies reporting on one eye were considered.
Conclusions: Orbscan pachymetry can be expected to yield CCT data that is approximately 7% higher than U/S. The global application of a 0.92 AF does not robustly align the Orbscan CCT data to that of U/S and, in fact, can easily result in the data being as much as 7% lower. Overall, the level of agreement between Orbscan and U/S is limited, and Orbscan data should simply be reported as measured without any adjustment.
Similar articles
-
Average 3-dimensional models for the comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam pachymetry maps in normal corneas.Ophthalmology. 2009 Nov;116(11):2064-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.04.036. Epub 2009 Sep 10. Ophthalmology. 2009. PMID: 19744719
-
An assessment of regional differences in corneal thickness in normal human eyes, using the Orbscan II or ultrasound pachymetry.Optometry. 2007 Apr;78(4):181-90. doi: 10.1016/j.optm.2006.08.018. Optometry. 2007. PMID: 17400140
-
Central and peripheral corneal thickness measurement with Orbscan II and topographical ultrasound pachymetry.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Jan;29(1):125-32. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01815-1. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003. PMID: 12551679
-
[Precision and reliability of Orbscan and ultrasonic pachymetry].J Fr Ophtalmol. 2001 Nov;24(9):912-21. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2001. PMID: 11912833 Review. French.
-
Sectorial and annular quantitative area pachymetry with the Orbscan II.J Refract Surg. 2007 Jan;23(1):89-92. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20070101-14. J Refract Surg. 2007. PMID: 17269249 Review.
Cited by
-
Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in healthy eyes using four different optical devices.Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;37(4):1039-1045. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0369-2. Epub 2016 Oct 8. Int Ophthalmol. 2017. PMID: 27723007 Free PMC article.
-
Agreement and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurements by four different optical devices and an ultrasound pachymeter.Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul;39(7):1589-1598. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0983-2. Epub 2018 Jul 9. Int Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 29984376
-
[Medicinal glaucoma therapy. What can we learn from large randomized clinical trials?].Ophthalmologe. 2013 Dec;110(12):1134-48. doi: 10.1007/s00347-012-2671-3. Ophthalmologe. 2013. PMID: 24337205 German.
-
Corneal Thickness Response after Anesthetic Eye Drops: Our Own Results and Meta-Analysis.Biomed Res Int. 2018 Mar 5;2018:4743721. doi: 10.1155/2018/4743721. eCollection 2018. Biomed Res Int. 2018. PMID: 29693008 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation between central corneal thickness and myopia in Taiwan.Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2014 Jan;30(1):20-4. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Sep 24. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2014. PMID: 24388054 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources