Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Feb;106(3):683-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-1737-x. Epub 2010 Jan 28.

Comparative efficacy of conventional primer sets in detection of Cryptosporidium parvum for diagnostic use

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative efficacy of conventional primer sets in detection of Cryptosporidium parvum for diagnostic use

Sirri Kar et al. Parasitol Res. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

In this study, the sensitivity and specificity of different previously described primer sets for Cryptosporidium parvum detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was evaluated. For this purpose, the primer sets defined by Cacciò et al. (FEMS Microbiol Lett 170(1):173-179, 1999) (tub), Widmer et al. (Appl Environ Microbiol 64(11):4477-4481, 1998) (btub) and Rochelle et al. (Appl Environ Microbiol 63:2029-2037, 1997) (cphsp), respectively, were used. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was isolated from three different sample materials: (1) from the faeces of an experimentally C. parvum-infected calf, (2) from purified C. parvum oocysts, and (3) from C. parvum-infected HCT-8 cell cultures. The DNA samples were subjected to PCR reactions with each of the three given primer sets to investigate sensitivity and suitability for routine use. The primers described by Cacciò et al. (FEMS Microbiol Lett 170(1):173-179, 1999) (TUB) were superior regarding sensitivity and specificity in terms of detection of C. parvum in faeces, in purified oocysts and also in cell culture, and may thus be applied for routine diagnostic use in common sample materials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2009 Jun-Sep;41(3):185-96 - PubMed
    1. J Parasitol. 1999 Oct;85(5):839-49 - PubMed
    1. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002 Aug;43(4):283-8 - PubMed
    1. Vet Parasitol. 2008 Nov 25;158(1-2):11-22 - PubMed
    1. Int J Parasitol. 2000 Nov;30(12-13):1305-22 - PubMed