Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010;40(2):125-31.
doi: 10.1007/s00595-008-4038-6. Epub 2010 Jan 28.

Organ-preserving surgery for benign lesions and low-grade malignancies of the pancreatic head: a matched case-control study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Organ-preserving surgery for benign lesions and low-grade malignancies of the pancreatic head: a matched case-control study

Juli Busquets et al. Surg Today. 2010.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the postoperative results of various preservative surgery (PS) techniques with those of two types of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).

Methods: The subjects of this study were 65 patients treated surgically for chronic pancreatitis, or benign or borderline tumors. We defined PS as any of the following: duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR), uncinatectomy (UC), and cystic tumor enucleation (EN). The two types of PD were Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy (WPD) and pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD).

Results: Benign lesions were treated with PD in 41 patients and PS in 24 patients. Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy was performed in 17 patients, PPPD in 24, DPPHR in 20, EN in 3, and UC in 1. The main indication for surgery was chronic pancreatitis (66%). Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) was seen in 41% of patients in the PD group but none in the PS group (P = 0.04). However, there were no differences between the two groups in the incidence of pancreatic fistulas or other complications. Reoperation was required in five of the PD patients, but none of the PS patients.

Conclusion: Surgical techniques for preserving pancreatic tissue are effective for carefully selected patients with benign pancreatic disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gut. 1988 Mar;29(3):358-65 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 2003 Feb;138(2):162-8; discussion 168 - PubMed
    1. Surgery. 1985 Apr;97(4):467-73 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1987 Jan;74(1):35-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1997 Mar;173(3):210-2 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources