[Epidemiology of contact dermatitis: prevalence of sensitization to different allergens and associated factors]
- PMID: 20109394
[Epidemiology of contact dermatitis: prevalence of sensitization to different allergens and associated factors]
Erratum in
- Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2010 Mar;101(2):196
Abstract
Background: In clinical practice, contact dermatitis is a relatively common skin complaint, whose prevalence has increased in recent years. Study by patch testing is essential for diagnosis of contact sensitization.
Objectives: To study the prevalence of sensitization to different allergens in a standard battery and observe the influence of different epidemiological and clinical variables on contact sensitization. A large number of allergens were included in our battery in order to detect new sensitizations whose prevalence might justify further study.
Material and methods: This was a retrospective, observational, epidemiological study of 1092 patients, conducted in our skin allergy unit between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2005. All patients were studied with a battery of 51 allergens. We assessed the following variables: sex, age, type of referral, occupation, site and course of skin lesions, personal and family history of atopy, positive patch tests, clinical significance, diagnosis, source of sensitization, and occupational relationship.
Results: At least 1 positive result was found in 55% of the patients, and 55.7% presented atopic dermatitis in one of its clinical variants: allergic contact dermatitis (28.2%), irritant contact dermatitis (20.1%), photoallergic contact dermatitis (2.2%), and phototoxic contact dermatitis (1.2%). The most prevalent allergens were nickel sulfate (29.3%), palladium chloride (11.7%), cobalt chloride (10.8%), potassium dichromate (7.5%), fragrance blends (6.3%), and p-phenylenediamine (6.1%). A positive occupational relationship was found in 41.1%, and 21.3% of the patients studied were diagnosed with occupational contact dermatitis. Metal workers, construction workers, and professional hairdressers were the most strongly represented groups. The most common source of sensitization was contact with metallic objects, followed by drugs, cosmetics, and rubber items. Female sex was the only independent variable that had a significant influence on the risk of contact sensitization in general.
Conclusion: Women became sensitized at a younger age than men, and the frequency of positive results in the patch tests increased with age, reaching a maximum at between 60 and 69 years of age, when the greatest rate of sensitization occurred. Comparison of our results with other Spanish data showed a progressive and constant increase in sensitization to nickel sulfate, fragrance blends, balsam of Peru, and rosin, and a decrease in sensitization to potassium dichromate. The inclusion of new allergens such as palladium chloride, diallyl disulfide, and p-toluene sulfonamide formaldehyde improved the sensitivity of the standard battery in the detection of contact sensitization. We therefore recommend further studies of these allergens.
Similar articles
-
[Contact sensitization to allergens in the Spanish standard series at Hospital Costa del Sol in Marbella, Spain: a retrospective study (2005-2010)].Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2012 Apr;103(3):223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2011.07.010. Epub 2011 Oct 1. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2012. PMID: 21963222 Spanish.
-
Occupational chromate allergy in Singapore: a study of 87 patients and a review from 1983 to 1995.Am J Contact Dermat. 1998 Mar;9(1):1-5. Am J Contact Dermat. 1998. PMID: 9471980
-
[Results of patch test in hairdressers examined in the institute of occupational medicine in Łódź].Med Pr. 2009;60(6):459-67. Med Pr. 2009. PMID: 20187494 Polish.
-
Contact dermatitis in the textile industry: a review of 72 patients.Am J Contact Dermat. 1996 Dec;7(4):226-30. Am J Contact Dermat. 1996. PMID: 8955486 Review.
-
Contact sensitization in the elderly.Clin Dermatol. 2011 Jan-Feb;29(1):24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2010.07.003. Clin Dermatol. 2011. PMID: 21146728 Review.
Cited by
-
Contact dermatitis: Clinical practice findings from a single tertiary referral hospital, a 4-Year retrospective study.World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Aug 11;13(7):100440. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100440. eCollection 2020 Jul. World Allergy Organ J. 2020. PMID: 32817780 Free PMC article.
-
The Association of Smoking with Contact Dermatitis: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 2;11(3):427. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030427. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36767002 Free PMC article.
-
Requirements for Alternative In Vitro and In Silico Skin Models of Irritant and Allergic Contact Dermatitis.Contact Dermatitis. 2025 Sep;93(3):187-203. doi: 10.1111/cod.14815. Epub 2025 May 30. Contact Dermatitis. 2025. PMID: 40443256 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Allergic contact dermatitis pattern in Kuwait: nickel leads the pack. In-depth analysis of nickel allergy based on the results from a large prospective patch test series report.Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2017 Jun;34(3):207-215. doi: 10.5114/ada.2017.67843. Epub 2017 May 29. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2017. PMID: 28670248 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Sex and Gender in Dermatology - From Pathogenesis to Clinical Implications.J Cutan Med Surg. 2023 Jul-Aug;27(4):NP1-NP36. doi: 10.1177/12034754231177582. Epub 2023 Jul 4. J Cutan Med Surg. 2023. PMID: 37401812 Free PMC article. Review.