Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Fall;11(4):190-5.

Skin preparation for the prevention of surgical site infection: which agent is best?

Micah L Hemani  1 , Herbert Lepor
Affiliations

Skin preparation for the prevention of surgical site infection: which agent is best?

Micah L Hemani et al. Rev Urol. 2009 Fall.

Abstract

Procedural and surgical site infections create difficult and complex clinical scenarios. A source for pathogens is often thought to be the skin surface, making skin preparation at the time of the procedure critical. The most common skin preparation agents used today include products containing iodophors or chlorhexidine gluconate. Agents are further classified by whether they are aqueous-based or alcohol-based solutions. Traditional aqueous-based iodophors, such as povidone-iodine, are one of the few products that can be safely used on mucous membrane surfaces. Alcohol-based solutions are quick, sustained, and durable, with broader spectrum antimicrobial activity. These agents seem ideal for longer open surgeries with the potential for irrigation or surgical spillage, such as cystoprostatectomy, radical prostatectomy, and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.

Keywords: Procedural and surgical site infection; Skin pathogens; Skin preparation solutions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Application of DuraPrep™ Surgical Solution (3M Health Care, St. Paul, MN). Adapted with permission from 3M Health Care.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bacterial log reduction after saline challenge. *P < .003 for soak condition. Reproduced with permission from Stahl JB et al.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:250–278. quiz 279–280. - PubMed
    1. Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL, et al. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:725–730. - PubMed
    1. Newsom BD. Surgical wound infections: a historical review. Int J Infect Control. 2008;4:1.
    1. Digison MB. A review of antiseptic agents for pre-operative skin preparation. Plast Surg Nurs. 2007;27:185–189. quiz 190–191. - PubMed
    1. Hibbard JS. Analyses comparing the antimicrobial activity and safety of current antiseptic agents: a review. J Infus Nurs. 2005;28:194–207. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources