Magnetic resonance imaging, pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: current situation and clinical perspective
- PMID: 20111641
- PMCID: PMC2810033
Magnetic resonance imaging, pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: current situation and clinical perspective
Abstract
New developments and expanding indications have resulted in a significant increase in the number of patients with pacemakers and internal cardioverterdefibrillators (ICDs). Because of its unique capabilities, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become one of the most important imaging modalities for evaluation of the central nervous system, tumours, musculoskeletal disorders and some cardiovascular diseases. As a consequence of these developments, an increasing number of patients with implanted devices meet the standard indications for MRI examination. Due to the presence of potential life-threatening risks and interactions, however, pacemakers and ICDs are currently not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in an MRI scanner. Despite these limitations and restrictions, a limited but still growing number of studies reporting on the effects and safety issues of MRI and implanted devices have been published. Because physicians will be increasingly confronted with the issue of MRI in patients with implanted devices, this overview is given. The effects of MRI on an implanted pacemaker and/or ICDs and vice versa are described and, based on the current literature, a strategy for safe performance of MRI in these patients is proposed. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:31-7.).
Keywords: implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; magnetic resonance imaging; pacemaker.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come?Eur Heart J. 2015 Jun 21;36(24):1505-11. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv086. Epub 2015 Mar 21. Eur Heart J. 2015. PMID: 25796053 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Implications of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in urological practice.J Urol. 2011 Oct;186(4):1198-205. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2697. Epub 2011 Aug 16. J Urol. 2011. PMID: 21849189 Review.
-
Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with implanted cardiac prostheses and metallic cardiovascular electronic devices.Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Jun;91(6):2006-11. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.068. Epub 2011 Apr 30. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011. PMID: 21531377 Review.
-
Safety of MRIs in patients with pacemakers and defibrillators.Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2013 Jul-Sep;9(3):137-41. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-9-3-137. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2013. PMID: 24066196 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic Value of MRI in Patients With Implanted Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Across a Cross Population: Does the Benefit Justify the Risk? A Proof of Concept Study.JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Sep;3(9):991-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 Jun 28. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017. PMID: 29759724
Cited by
-
SSh versus TSE sequence protocol in rapid MR examination of pediatric patients with programmable drainage system.Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 May;33(5):753-758. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3385-2. Epub 2017 Mar 24. Childs Nerv Syst. 2017. PMID: 28342115
-
Importance Of Delayed Enhanced Cardiac MRI In Idiopathic RVOT-VT: Differentiating Mimics Including Early Stage ARVC And Cardiac Sarcoidosis.J Atr Fibrillation. 2014 Dec 31;7(4):1097. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1097. eCollection 2014 Dec. J Atr Fibrillation. 2014. PMID: 27957128 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: a review of the dangers and difficulties in MR scanning and attempts to improve safety.Insights Imaging. 2017 Aug;8(4):405-418. doi: 10.1007/s13244-017-0556-3. Epub 2017 Jun 17. Insights Imaging. 2017. PMID: 28624970 Free PMC article. Review.
-
MRI and cardiac implantable electronic devices; current status and required safety conditions.Neth Heart J. 2014 Jun;22(6):269-76. doi: 10.1007/s12471-014-0544-x. Neth Heart J. 2014. PMID: 24733688 Free PMC article.
-
Malfunction of an MRI-Conditional Pacemaker Following an MRI.HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2016 Dec 16;3(2):148-150. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2016.11.007. eCollection 2017 Feb. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2016. PMID: 28491791 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, Krueger S, Kass DA, De Marco T, et al; Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) Investigators. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2140–50. - PubMed
-
- Lamas GA, Orav EJ, Stambler BS, Ellenbogen KA, Sgarbossa EB, Huang SK, et al. Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dualchamber pacing. Pacemaker selection in the elderly investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996:336:1097–104. - PubMed
-
- Connolly SJ, Kerr C, Gent M, Roberts RS, Yusuf S, Gillis AM, et al. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular cause. Canadian trial of physiologic pacing investigators. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1385–91. - PubMed
-
- Maisel WH, Sweeney MO, Stevenson WG, Ellison KE, Epstein LM. Recalls and safety alerts involving pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generators. JAMA. 2001;286:793–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials