The health and economic effects of HPV DNA screening in The Netherlands
- PMID: 20112339
- DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25211
The health and economic effects of HPV DNA screening in The Netherlands
Abstract
We studied the health and economic effects of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing in cervical screening using a simulation model. The key data source was a Dutch longitudinal screening trial. We compared cytological testing with repeat cytology (for borderline/mildly abnormal smears) to HPV testing with cytology triage (for HPV-positive smears), combination testing (combined HPV and cytology) and cytological testing with HPV triage (for borderline/mildly abnormal smears). We varied the screening interval from 5 to 10 years. The main outcome measures were the number of cervical cancer cases, the number of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The base-case estimates were accompanied with ranges across 118 calibrated parameter settings (calibration criteria: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3, cancer and mortality rates). In comparison to 5-yearly cytology, 5-yearly HPV testing with cytology triage gave a reduction in the number of cancer cases of 23% (range, 9-27%). The reduction was 26% (range, 10-29%) for combination testing and 3% (range, -1 to 8%) for cytology with HPV triage. For strategies with primary HPV testing, the model also estimated a reduction in cancer cases when the screening interval was extended to 7.5 years. Five-yearly cytology with HPV triage and 5 to 7.5-yearly HPV testing with cytology triage were cost effective for the base-case settings and the majority of calibrated parameter settings (ICER below Dutch willingness-to-pay threshold of euro20,000/QALY). Our model indicates that HPV testing with cytology triage is likely to be cost effective. An extension of the screening interval may be considered to control costs.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: cytology versus human papillomavirus DNA testing.BJOG. 2012 May;119(6):699-709. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03228.x. Epub 2012 Jan 18. BJOG. 2012. PMID: 22251259 Free PMC article.
-
Cost effectiveness of high-risk HPV DNA testing for cervical cancer screening in South Africa.Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Feb;112(2):377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.030. Epub 2008 Dec 11. Gynecol Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19081611
-
Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus DNA testing in the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, France, and Italy.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 15;97(12):888-95. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji162. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005. PMID: 15956650
-
The cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus screening for cervical cancer. A review of recent modelling studies.Eur J Health Econ. 2005 Mar;6(1):30-7. doi: 10.1007/s10198-004-0254-1. Eur J Health Econ. 2005. PMID: 15682286 Review.
-
Primary human papillomavirus testing in organized cervical screening.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;25(1):11-6. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32835c5d10. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23299089 Review.
Cited by
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Primary HPV Testing, Cytology and Co-testing as Cervical Cancer Screening for Women Above Age 30 Years.J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Nov;31(11):1338-1344. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3772-5. Epub 2016 Jul 14. J Gen Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 27418345 Free PMC article.
-
Disagreement between human papillomavirus assays: an unexpected challenge for the choice of an assay in primary cervical screening.PLoS One. 2014 Jan 20;9(1):e86835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086835. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24466262 Free PMC article.
-
A Scoping Review on Calibration Methods for Cancer Simulation Models.Med Decis Making. 2025 Aug 11:272989X251353211. doi: 10.1177/0272989X251353211. Online ahead of print. Med Decis Making. 2025. PMID: 40790869 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of repeated self-sampling for HPV testing in primary cervical screening: a randomized study.BMC Cancer. 2020 Jul 13;20(1):645. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07085-9. BMC Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32660432 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Optimizing technology for cervical cancer screening in high-resource settings.Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;6(3):343-353. doi: 10.1586/eog.11.13. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 26617667 Free PMC article.