Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Jul-Sep;2(3):249-53.

Selecting criteria for the right prosthesis in defect of the abdominal wall surgery

Affiliations
Review

Selecting criteria for the right prosthesis in defect of the abdominal wall surgery

H Mohamed et al. J Med Life. 2009 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

The article is debating a theme of great interest for the defect of the abdominal wall surgery--the use of biocompatible prosthesis. The surgeon is often confused by the avalanche of offers made by the mesh producers, making it mandatory for him to know very well the behavior of these alloplastic structures in the tissue environment. From this point of view, we have discussed both the physicochemical properties and the histological reaction brought by the most common type of meshes: polypropylene, polyethylene - tereftalat, polytetrafluorideethylene. This presentation brings out the minimal but mandatory criteria for any mesh to be accepted, but also the criteria that need to be taken into consideration when we try to improve the qualities of the mesh closer to the desideratum of the "ideal mesh". The main conclusion of this review is that we have to change the myth of the "ideal mesh" with "the right chosen mesh", that based on its chemical, physical, structural and biological qualities will adapt perfectly first to the patient's needs and second to the surgeon's needs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. D Ion. Protezarea cu materiale textile a defectelor parietale abdominale postincizionale. Bucharest: Ed. Rosetti International; 2006.
    1. HS Goldstein. A university experience using mesh in inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2002;5:182–185. - PubMed
    1. J Conze, A.N Kingsnorth, J.B Flament, R Simmermacher, G Arlt, C Langer, E Schippers, M Hartley, V Schumpelick. Randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight composite mesh with polyester or polypropylene mesh for incisional hernia repair. British Journal of Surgery . 2005;92:1488–1493. - PubMed
    1. M Bay-Nielsen, F.M Perkins, H Kehlet. Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann Surg. 2001;233:1–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. PJ O’Dwyer, AN Kingsnorth, R.G Molloy, PK Small, B Lammers, G Horeysck. Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. British Journal of Surgery. 2005;92:166–170. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources