Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan 29:9:5.
doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-9-5.

Is the smokers exposure to environmental tobacco smoke negligible?

Affiliations

Is the smokers exposure to environmental tobacco smoke negligible?

Maria Teresa Piccardo et al. Environ Health. .

Abstract

Background: Very few studies have evaluated the adverse effect of passive smoking exposure among active smokers, probably due to the unproven assumption that the dose of toxic compounds that a smoker inhales by passive smoke is negligible compared to the dose inhaled by active smoke.

Methods: In a controlled situation of indoor active smoking, we compared daily benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) dose, estimated to be inhaled by smokers due to the mainstream (MS) of cigarettes they have smoked, to the measured environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) they inhaled in an indoor environment. For this aim, we re-examined our previous study on daily personal exposure to BaP of thirty newsagents, according to their smoking habits.

Results: Daily BaP dose due to indoor environmental contamination measured inside newsstands (traffic emission and ETS produced by smoker newsagents) was linearly correlated (p = 0.001 R2 = 0.62) with estimated BaP dose from MS of daily smoked cigarettes. In smoker subjects, the percentage of BaP daily dose due to ETS, in comparison to mainstream dose due to smoked cigarettes, was estimated with 95% confidence interval, between 14.6% and 23% for full flavour cigarettes and between 21% and 34% for full flavour light cigarettes.

Conclusions: During indoor smoking, ETS contribution to total BaP dose of the same smoker, may be not negligible. Therefore both active and passive smoking exposures should be considered in studies about health of active smokers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
BaP daily dose from environmental sources versus BaP dose from mainstream of daily smoked cigarettes. Figure shows linear correlation between daily dose of Env-BaP and MS-BaP dose of 15 non-smoking and 15 smoking newsagents, in Genoa, during 1998. MS-BaP dose was estimated from mean BaP content in FFL cigarettes mainstream [1]. Dotted curves define 95% confidence limits, according uncertainty of measured BaP air concentrations and variability of BaP quantity estimated in mainstream of FFL cigarettes sold in U.S. and Italian market, from 1995 and 2000.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Swauger JE, Steichen TJ, Murphy PA, Kinsler S. An Analysis of the Mainstream Smoke Chemistry of Samples of the U.S. Cigarette Market Acquired between 1995 and 2000. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2002;35:142–156. doi: 10.1006/rtph.2001.1521. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bolte G, Heitmann D, Kiranoglu M, Schierl R, Diemer J, Koerner W, Fromme H. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in German restaurants, pubs and discotheques. Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology. 2008;18:262–271. doi: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500590. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gan Q, Smith KR, Hammond SK, Hu T-w. Disease burden of adult lung cancer and ischaemic heart disease from passive tobacco smoking in China. Tobacco control. 2007;16:417–422. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.021477. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. López MJ, Pérez-Ríos M, Schiaffino A, Nebot M, Montes A, Ariza C, García M, Juárez O, Moncada A, Fernández E. Mortality attributable to passive smoking in Spain, 2002. Tobacco control. 2007;16:373–377. doi: 10.1136/tc.2006.019679. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vineis P, Hoek G, Krzyzanowski M, Vigna-Taglianti F, Veglia F, Airoldi L, Overvad K, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Clavel-Chapelon F, Linseisen J, Boeing H, Trichopoulou A, Palli D, Krogh V, Tumino R, Panico S, Bueno-De-Mesquita HB, Peeters PH, Lund EE, Agudo A, Martinez C, Dorronsoro M, Barricarte A, Cirera L, Quiros JR, Berglund G, Manjer J, Forsberg B, Day NE, Key TJ, Kaaks R, Saracci R, Riboli E. Lung cancers attributable to environmental tobacco smoke and air pollution in non-smokers in different European countries: a prospective study. Environmental Health. 2007;6:7. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-6-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms