Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jan 29:10:46.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-46.

Comparison of hip fracture incidence and trends between Germany and Austria 1995-2004: an epidemiological study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of hip fracture incidence and trends between Germany and Austria 1995-2004: an epidemiological study

Eva Mann et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Several studies evaluated variations in hip fracture incidences, as well as trends of the hip fracture incidences. Comparisons of trends are lacking so far. We compared the incidence rates and, in particular, its trends between Austria and Germany 1995 to 2004 analysing national hospital discharge diagnosis register data.

Methods: Annual frequencies of hip fractures and corresponding incidences per 100,000 person years were estimated, overall and stratified for sex and age, assuming Poisson distribution. Multiple Poisson regression models including country and calendar year, age and sex were used to analyse differences in incidence and trend. The difference of annual changes between the two countries was explored using an interaction term (calender year * country).

Results: Overall, the increase of hip fracture risk was 1.31 fold higher (95% CI 1.29-1.34) in Austria compared to Germany, adjusted for age, sex, and calendar year. The risk increase was comparable for both sexes (males: RR 1.35 (1.32-1.37), females: RR 1.31 (1.29-1.33)). Hip fracture trend from 1995 to 2004 indicates an increase in both countries without a statistically significant difference between Austria and Germany (interaction term: p = 0.67).

Conclusion: In this study comparing hip fracture incidences and its trend using pooled data, the incidence in Austria was 30% higher compared to its neighbouring country Germany. For both countries a similar increasing trend of hip fracture incidence over the 10-year study period was calculated. The results need confirmation by other studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Incidence rates (IRs) and standardised rate ratios (SRRs) of hip fractures 1995-2004: Austria versus Germany, men and women.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis JA. Worldwide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7:407–413. doi: 10.1007/PL00004148. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ. Hip fractures in the elderly: a worldwide projection. Osteoporos Int. 1992;2:285–228. doi: 10.1007/BF01623184. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kannus P, Parkkari J, Sievanen H, Heinonen A, Vuori I, Jarvinen M. Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone. 1996;18:57–63. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(95)00381-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bacon WE, Muggi S, Looker A, Harris T, Nair CR, Giacom J, Honkinen R, Ho SC, Peffers KA, Torring O, Gass R, Gonzalez N. International comparison of hip fracture rates in 1988-1989. Osteoporos Int. 1996;6:69–75. doi: 10.1007/BF01626541. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Falch JA, Ilebekk A, Slungaard U. Epidemiology of hip fractures in Norway. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995;56:12–16. - PubMed

Publication types