Factors associated with congruence between preferred and actual place of death
- PMID: 20116205
- PMCID: PMC2843755
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.07.007
Factors associated with congruence between preferred and actual place of death
Abstract
Congruence between preferred and actual place of death may be an essential component in terminal care. Most patients prefer a home death, but many patients do not die in their preferred location. Specialized (physician, hospice, and palliative) home care visits may increase home deaths, but factors associated with congruence have not been systematically reviewed. This study sought to review the extent of congruence reported in the literature and examine factors that may influence congruence. In July 2009, a comprehensive literature search was performed using MEDLINE, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Reference lists, related articles, and the past five years of six palliative care journals were also searched. Overall congruence rates (percentage of met preferences for all locations of death) were calculated for each study using reported data to allow cross-study comparison. Eighteen articles described 30%-91% congruence. Eight specialized home care studies reported 59%-91% congruence. A physician-led home care program reported 91% congruence. Of the 10 studies without specialized home care for all patients, seven reported 56%-71% congruence and most reported unique care programs. Of the remaining three studies without specialized home care for all patients, two reported 43%-46% congruence among hospital inpatients, and one elicited patient preference "if everything were possible," with 30% congruence. Physician support, hospice enrollment, and family support improved congruence in multiple studies. Research in this important area must consider potential sources of bias, the method of eliciting patient preference, and the absence of a single ideal place of death.
(c) 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Congruence between Preferred and Actual Place of Death for Those in Receipt of Home-Based Palliative Care.J Palliat Med. 2020 Nov;23(11):1460-1467. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0582. Epub 2020 Apr 15. J Palliat Med. 2020. PMID: 32286904
-
Place of Death for Adults Receiving Specialist Palliative Care in Their Last 3 Months of Life: Factors Associated With Preferred Place, Actual Place, and Place of Death Congruence.J Palliat Care. 2024 Jul;39(3):184-193. doi: 10.1177/08258597241231042. Epub 2024 Feb 25. J Palliat Care. 2024. PMID: 38404130 Free PMC article.
-
Methodological review: measured and reported congruence between preferred and actual place of death.Palliat Med. 2009 Sep;23(6):482-90. doi: 10.1177/0269216309106318. Epub 2009 Jun 3. Palliat Med. 2009. PMID: 19494055 Review.
-
Determinants of congruence between the preferred and actual place of death for terminally ill cancer patients.J Palliat Care. 2003 Winter;19(4):230-7. J Palliat Care. 2003. PMID: 14959592
-
Patient and Family Preferences About Place of End-of-Life Care and Death: An Umbrella Review.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 May;67(5):e439-e452. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.01.014. Epub 2024 Jan 17. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024. PMID: 38237790
Cited by
-
Family preference for place of death mediates the relationship between patient preference and actual place of death: a nationwide retrospective cross-sectional study.PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e56848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056848. Epub 2013 Mar 8. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23520458 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Preferred Place of Death in Adult Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 27;12:704590. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704590. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34512460 Free PMC article.
-
Delivering preference for place of death in a specialist palliative care setting.BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2013 Aug 21;2(1):u201375.w897. doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u201375.w897. eCollection 2013. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2013. PMID: 26734208 Free PMC article.
-
Associations with the Japanese population's preferences for the place of end-of-life care and their need for receiving health care services.J Palliat Med. 2012 Oct;15(10):1106-12. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0034. Epub 2012 Jul 12. J Palliat Med. 2012. PMID: 22788951 Free PMC article.
-
What's the Plan? Needing Assistance with Plan of Care Is Associated with In-Hospital Death for ICU Patients Referred for Palliative Care Consultation.Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2016 Aug;75(8):235-41. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27563500 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Weitzen S, Teno JM, Fennell M, Mor V. Factors associated with site of death: a national study of where people die. Med Care. 2003;41(2):323–335. - PubMed
-
- Field M, Cassel C. Approaching death: Improving care at the end of life. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1997. - PubMed
-
- Tang ST, McCorkle R. Determinants of congruence between the preferred and actual place of death for terminally ill cancer patients. J Palliat Care. 2003;19(4):230–237. - PubMed
-
- Higginson IJ, Sen-Gupta GJ. Place of care in advanced cancer: a qualitative systematic literature review of patient preferences. J Palliat Med. 2000;3(3):287–300. - PubMed
-
- Foreman LM, Hunt RW, Luke CG, Roder DM. Factors predictive of preferred place of death in the general population of South Australia. Palliat Med. 2006;20(4):447–453. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous