Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 May-Jun;43(3):230-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

Comparison of serial measurements of infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and electrocardiographic QRS scoring in reperfused anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of serial measurements of infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and electrocardiographic QRS scoring in reperfused anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Robin A P Weir et al. J Electrocardiol. 2010 May-Jun.

Abstract

Background: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a powerful prognostic marker after acute myocardial infarction and is dependent on infarct magnitude. Contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (ceCMR) represents the current criterion standard means of LVEF and infarct size measurement. Infarct size and LVEF can be estimated from the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) using the Selvester QRS score. We examined for the first time the relationship between serial measures of LVEF and infarct size by ceCMR and ECG in patients with reperfused anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and depressed LVEF.

Methods: Thirty-four patients (mean +/- SD age, 59 +/- 11.8 years; 70.6% male) underwent ceCMR and simultaneous ECG at mean 93 hours after admission and at 12 and 24 weeks. The QRS score was calculated on each ECG, from which infarct size and LVEF were estimated and compared with the equivalent ceCMR measurements.

Results: Infarct size on ceCMR was higher than that by QRS score at each time-point (P < .001) with modest correlation (r = 0.56-0.78, P < .001). Left ventricular ejection fraction was consistently significantly higher on CMR than on ECG, with weak correlation (r = 0.37-0.51, P < .05). We derived a novel equation relating QRS score to CMR-measured LVEF in the subacute phase of infarction: LVEF = 61 - (1.7 x QRS score) (%).

Conclusions: In patients with reperfused anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction and depressed LVEF, ceCMR is moderately correlated with the QRS in the serial measurement of infarct size and LVEF. Infarct size (measured by ceCMR) and LVEF are consistently higher than those calculated on the QRS score in the acute and subacute phases of infarction.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00132093.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Associated data