Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography
- PMID: 20116873
- DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.12.003
Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography
Abstract
Since the founding of the osseointegration concept, the characteristics of the interface between bone and implant, and possible ways to improve it, have been of particular interest in dental and orthopaedic implant research. Making use of standardized tools of analysis and terminology, we present here a standardized characterization code for osseointegrated implant surfaces. This code describes the chemical composition of the surface, that is, the core material, such as titanium, and its chemical or biochemical modification through impregnation or coating. This code also defines the physical surface features, at the micro- and nanoscale, such as microroughness, microporosity, nanoroughness, nanotubes, nanoparticles, nanopatterning and fractal architecture. This standardized classification system will allow to clarify unambiguously the identity of any given osseointegrated surface and help to identify the biological outcomes of each surface characteristic.
2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):808-16. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009. PMID: 19865620
-
In vivo evaluation of plasma-sprayed titanium coating after alkali modification.Biomaterials. 2005 Jun;26(16):3029-37. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.003. Biomaterials. 2005. PMID: 15603798
-
Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Aug;67(8):1706-15. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.046. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19615586
-
Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis.Micron. 2005;36(7-8):630-44. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2005.07.008. Epub 2005 Sep 6. Micron. 2005. PMID: 16182543 Review.
-
Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):616-26. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009. PMID: 19885401 Review.
Cited by
-
Fibronectin and vitronectin promote human fetal osteoblast cell attachment and proliferation on nanoporous titanium surfaces.J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2013 Jun;9(6):1092-7. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2013.1601. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2013. PMID: 23858975 Free PMC article.
-
Adverse effects of sterilization processes on the fundamental topographic properties of modified dental implant surfaces.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2024 Jul 29;35(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s10856-024-06813-y. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2024. PMID: 39073722 Free PMC article.
-
Functional engineering strategies of 3D printed implants for hard tissue replacement.Regen Biomater. 2022 Nov 24;10:rbac094. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbac094. eCollection 2023. Regen Biomater. 2022. PMID: 36683758 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Glancing-Angle Deposition of Nanostructures on an Implant Material Surface.Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019 Jan 4;9(1):60. doi: 10.3390/nano9010060. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019. PMID: 30621132 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of machined versus structured implant shoulder designs on crestal bone level changes: a randomized, controlled, multicenter study.Int J Implant Dent. 2022 Jul 16;8(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00432-4. Int J Implant Dent. 2022. PMID: 35841488 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources