Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr;42(4):196-203.
doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.09.026. Epub 2010 Feb 8.

[Patient satisfaction with the patient-doctor relationship measured using the questionnaire (PDRQ-9)]

[Article in Spanish]
Affiliations

[Patient satisfaction with the patient-doctor relationship measured using the questionnaire (PDRQ-9)]

[Article in Spanish]
Jesús Martín-Fernández et al. Aten Primaria. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To describe patient satisfaction of their relationship with the family physician, using the PDRQ-9 questionnaire and assess its psychometric properties.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Six Primary Care Health centres in the Community of Madrid, Spain.

Participants: Four hundred and fifty one patients randomly selected from those who had just visited their family physician.

Interventions: Interviews were carried out to collect demographic characteristics, health needs, the accessibility to the service, and the socioeconomic situation of the subjects.

Measurements: The PDRQ-9 responses were collected and a synthetic satisfaction index was constructed. A multivariable model was designed to explain differences in satisfaction.

Results: The mean satisfaction index was 4.41 (95% CI: 4.33-4.48) on a scale of 1 (the worst) to 5 (the best satisfaction possible), with a median of 4.78 (interquartile range 4.00-5.00). Four of every 10 subjects expressed the maximum possible satisfaction ("ceiling effect"). A single factor explained 75.3% of the variance, with a Cronbach alpha value of 0.952. Age (OR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02-1.05) and living in rural areas (OR 1.44, 95% CI: 0.94-2.20) were associated with above average satisfaction.

Conclusions: Primary care users feel their relationship with their family physicians are very satisfactory, particularly in those who are older and who live in rural areas. The PDRQ-9 questionnaire shows a high internal consistency, but it is not good enough to discriminate in the upper part of the scale.

Objetivo: Describir la satisfacción del paciente con la relación con su médico de familia mediante la utilización del Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire versión de 9 preguntas (PDRQ-9) y reevaluar las propiedades psicométricas de éste.

Diseño: Estudio transversal.

Emplazamiento: Seis centros de Atención Primaria (AP) en la Comunidad de Madrid, España.

Participantes: Cuatrocientos cincuenta y un pacientes aleatorizadamente seleccionados que acababan de acudir a una consulta de Medicina de Familia.

Mediciones: Entrevista en la que se recogen características sociodemográficas del sujeto, su necesidad en salud, la accesibilidad al servicio y la situación socioeconómica. Se recogen las contestaciones a los 9 ítems del PDRQ-9 y se construye un índice sintético de satisfacción; se explican las diferencias en la satisfacción con un modelo multivariante.

Resultados: La media de la satisfacción fue de 4,41 (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 4,33 – 4,48) en una escala de uno (menor satisfacción) a 5 (mayor satisfacción) con una mediana de 4,78 (rango intercuartil: 4,00 – 5,00). Cuatro de cada 10 sujetos expresaban la máxima satisfacción posible (efecto techo). Un único factor explicaba el 75,3% de la variancia, con un valor alfa de Cronbach de 0,952. La edad (OR: 1,03, IC del 95%: 1,02 – 1,05) y el vivir en zonas rurales (OR: 1,44, IC del 95%: 0,94 – 2,20) se asociaban con una satisfacción mayor.

Conclusiones: Los usuarios de AP están bastante satisfechos con la relación con su médico, especialmente los de más edad y los que viven en ámbitos rurales. El PDRQ-9 tiene una elevada consistencia interna, pero presenta problemas de discriminación en la parte alta de la escala.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Esquema general del estudio
Esquema general del estudio
Estudio transversal mediante cuestionario a pacientes que habían acudido a la consulta de Medicina de Familia

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kaplan S.H., Greenfield S., Ware J.E., Jr Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989;27:S110–S127. - PubMed
    1. Beck R.S., Daughtridge R., Sloane P.D. Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: A systematic review. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002;15:25–38. - PubMed
    1. Murray E., Pollack L., White M., Lo B. Clinical decision-making: Patients’ preferences and experiences. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65:189–196. - PubMed
    1. Jahng K.H., Martin L.R., Golin C.E., DiMatteo M.R. Preferences for medical collaboration: Patient-physician congruence and patient outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:308–314. - PubMed
    1. Otani K., Kurz R.S., Harris L.E. Managing primary care using patient satisfaction measures. J Health Manag. 2005;50:311–324. - PubMed

Publication types