Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;83(3):287-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

Use of exclusion by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) during speech perception and auditory-visual matching-to-sample

Affiliations

Use of exclusion by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) during speech perception and auditory-visual matching-to-sample

Michael J Beran. Behav Processes. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

An adult female chimpanzee showed responding through use of exclusion in an auditory to visual matching-to-sample procedure. The chimpanzee had previously learned to associate specific visuographic symbols called lexigrams with real world referents and the spoken English words and photographs for those referents. On some trials, an unknown spoken English word was presented as the sample, and the match choices could consist of photographs or lexigrams that already were associated with known English words as well as unknown lexigrams or photos of objects without associated lexigrams. The chimpanzee reliably avoided choosing known comparisons for these unknown samples, instead relying on exclusion to choose comparisons that were of unknown lexigrams or photographs of items without associated lexigram symbols.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A. Panzee’s performance when presented with lexigram comparison stimuli and an undefined sample stimulus. Bars present her percentage correct and the expected performance level if exclusion was used. The lines indicate the percentage of incorrect trials that involved selection of an undefined comparison stimulus by Panzee and the percentage expected by chance. The thick horizontal line represents the true chance level (25%). B. Panzee’s performance when presented with photograph comparison stimuli and an undefined sample stimulus, shown in the same way as in A.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ackerman BP, Emmerich HJ. When recognition memory fails: The use of an elimination strategy by young children. Dev Psychol. 1978;14:286–293.
    1. Aust U, Range F, Steurer M, Huber L. Inferential reasoning by exclusion in pigeons, dogs, and humans. Anim Cogn. 2008;11:587–597. - PubMed
    1. Beran MJ. Maintenance of self-imposed delay of gratification by four chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) J Gen Psychol. 2002;129:49–66. - PubMed
    1. Beran MJ, Beran MM. Chimpanzees remember the results of one-by-one addition of food items to sets. Psychol Sci. 2004;15:94–99. - PubMed
    1. Beran MJ, Evans TA. Maintenance of delay of gratification by four chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): The effects of delayed reward visibility, experimenter presence, and extended delay intervals. Behav Process. 2006;73:315–324. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources