Current concepts of integrated coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory
- PMID: 20117397
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.062
Current concepts of integrated coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory
Abstract
Over the last 15 years, the use of invasive coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory has demonstrated favorable outcomes for decision making in patients with intermediate single-vessel stenoses, complex bifurcation and ostial branch stenoses, multivessel coronary artery disease, and left main stenoses. A recent large multicenter study (FAME [FFR versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation]) found that a physiologically-guided approach was superior to the standard angiographically-guided approach for percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. This review addresses selected pertinent concepts and studies supporting the integration of coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory for optimal patient outcomes.
Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jul 13;56(3):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012. Epub 2010 May 28. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20537493 Clinical Trial.
-
[Coronary artery disease diagnostic with fractional flow reserve].Rev Med Suisse. 2011 Jun 1;7(297):1182-8. Rev Med Suisse. 2011. PMID: 21717690 French.
-
Use of fractional flow reserve in contemporary scenarios of coronary revascularization.Minerva Med. 2011 Oct;102(5):399-415. Minerva Med. 2011. PMID: 22193350 Review.
-
Economic evaluation of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease.Circulation. 2010 Dec 14;122(24):2545-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.925396. Epub 2010 Nov 29. Circulation. 2010. PMID: 21126973 Clinical Trial.
-
Physiologic lesion assessment during percutaneous coronary intervention.Cardiol Clin. 2010 Feb;28(1):31-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2009.10.002. Cardiol Clin. 2010. PMID: 19962048 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of standard- and high-dose intracoronary adenosine for the measurement of coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR).Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Dec;105(12):1003-1010. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-1010-0. Epub 2016 Jun 15. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27307094
-
Sex-specific differences in coronary blood flow and flow velocity reserve in symptomatic patients with non-obstructive disease.EuroIntervention. 2021 Jan 20;16(13):1079-1084. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00520. EuroIntervention. 2021. PMID: 31589144 Free PMC article.
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention should be guided by fractional flow reserve measurement.Circulation. 2014 May 6;129(18):1860-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004300. Circulation. 2014. PMID: 24799502 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Cardiac CT for myocardial ischaemia detection and characterization--comparative analysis.Br J Radiol. 2014 Nov;87(1043):20140159. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140159. Epub 2014 Aug 19. Br J Radiol. 2014. PMID: 25135617 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Magnetic resonance Adenosine perfusion imaging as Gatekeeper of invasive coronary intervention (MAGnet): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2017 Jul 28;18(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2101-6. Trials. 2017. PMID: 28754155 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical