Introduction of the conducted electrical weapon into a hospital setting
- PMID: 20117901
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.09.031
Introduction of the conducted electrical weapon into a hospital setting
Abstract
Background: The TASER(®) X26 Conducted Electrical Weapon (CEW) provides painful stimuli and neuromuscular incapacitation to potentially violent persons. Use by law enforcement in society is common. Presenting a CEW is known to de-escalate some situations. Health care personnel sometimes encounter violent persons within the confines of the hospital. CEW use by health care security personnel has not been described.
Objective: The objective is to describe results from the introduction of the CEW into a hospital environment.
Methods: Upon introducing the CEW into an urban hospital campus, standardized reports were made describing all CEW use by hospital security. Reports were retrospectively reviewed for the first 12 months of CEW use. Collected data included force options used, potential injuries avoided, witness comments, outcomes, and whether the CEW required full activation or if inactive presentation was sufficient to control the situation. Rates of security personnel injuries were also gathered. Descriptive analysis was applied.
Results: Twenty-seven CEW deployments occurred: four were inactive presentation, 20 were presentation with LASER sight activation, and three were probe deployments with a 5-s delivery of electrical current. Two persons required evaluation for minor injuries not related to CEW use. Witnesses reported that in all incidents, injuries were likely avoided due to CEW presentation or use. CEW use aborted one suicide attempt. Personnel injury rates decreased during the study period.
Conclusion: CEW introduction into a health care setting demonstrated the ability to avert and control situations that could result in further injury to subjects, patients, and personnel. This correlates with a decrease in injury for hospital personnel. Further study is recommended for validation.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Conducted electrical weapon use by law enforcement: an evaluation of safety and injury.J Trauma. 2010 May;68(5):1239-46. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b28b78. J Trauma. 2010. PMID: 20032795
-
Absence of electrocardiographic change after prolonged application of a conducted electrical weapon in physically exhausted adults.J Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;41(5):466-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.03.023. Epub 2009 May 13. J Emerg Med. 2011. PMID: 19443165
-
Conducted electrical weapon (TASER) use against minors: a shocking analysis.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Sep;28(9):873-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31826763d1. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012. PMID: 22929134
-
Electrical weapons, hematocytes, and ischemic cardiovascular accidents.J Forensic Leg Med. 2020 Jul;73:101990. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2020.101990. Epub 2020 May 29. J Forensic Leg Med. 2020. PMID: 32658748
-
Taser and Conducted Energy Weapons.J Spec Oper Med. 2015 Winter;15(4):83-88. doi: 10.55460/9XC7-PB6V. J Spec Oper Med. 2015. PMID: 26630100 Review.
Cited by
-
Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities for Managing Potentially Volatile Police-Public Interactions: A Narrative Review.Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 7;13:818009. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.818009. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35330722 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources