[Effect of sevoflurane versus propofol-remifentanil anesthesia on neuromuscular blockade by continuous cisatracurium infusion]
- PMID: 20118012
[Effect of sevoflurane versus propofol-remifentanil anesthesia on neuromuscular blockade by continuous cisatracurium infusion]
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effects of sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia on neuromuscular blockade produced by continuous cisatracurium infusion.
Methods: Forty ASA I or II patients undergoing selective surgery were randomly divided into sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia groups (n=20). Neuromuscular blockade was monitored using train-of-four (TOF) stimulation by recording the contraction force of the adductor pollicis muscle with a muscle relaxation monitor. A bolus dose of cisatracurium of 0.15 mg/kg was administered to facilitate endotracheal intubation, followed by continuous infusion adjusted manually to maintain the first twitch (T1) < or = 5% of the control level. The following variables were recorded including the infusion rate, total amount of cisatracurium, spontaneous recovery index (RI), and the time interval from termination of infusion cisatracurium to recovery of TOF ratio (TOFR) to 0.9.
Results: With the maintenance of a 95%-99% neuromuscular blockade, the infusion rate was significantly lower in sevoflurane group than in propofol-remifentanil group (P<0.05), and stabilized in both groups after 120 min. No significant differences were found in RI or the time to TOFR of 0.9 between the two groups (P>0.05).
Conclusion: During the maintenance of stable neuromuscular blockade by continuous cisatracurium infusion, both sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia can time-dependently enhance the effect of cisatracurium without producing significant differences in the recovery properties.
Similar articles
-
Recovery from neuromuscular block following infusion of cisatracurium using either sevoflurane or propofol for anaesthesia.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Sep;21(9):751-3. doi: 10.1017/s0265021504259130. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004. PMID: 15595593 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
-
[The effect of anesthetic technique on recovery from neuromuscular blockade with cisatracurium].Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2001 Mar;48(3):117-21. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2001. PMID: 11333795 Clinical Trial. Spanish.
-
[Efficacy of sugammadex in the reversal of neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium in long-duration surgery: under inhaled vs. intravenous anesthesia].Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2009 Jun-Jul;56(6):349-54. doi: 10.1016/s0034-9356(09)70407-4. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2009. PMID: 19725342 Clinical Trial. Spanish.
-
[The clinical pharmacology of cisatracurium].Anaesthesist. 1997 Jun;46(6):481-5. doi: 10.1007/s001010050427. Anaesthesist. 1997. PMID: 9297378 Review. German.
-
Cisatracurium besilate. A review of its pharmacology and clinical potential in anaesthetic practice.Drugs. 1997 May;53(5):848-66. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199753050-00012. Drugs. 1997. PMID: 9129870 Review.
Cited by
-
Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia for postoperative cognitive outcomes in elderly people undergoing non-cardiac surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 21;8(8):CD012317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012317.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30129968 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical