[Extrauterine mislocated IUD]
- PMID: 20120941
[Extrauterine mislocated IUD]
Abstract
Intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is a safe and effective method of contraception, widely used all over the world. The most common IUD complications include heavy bleeding, painful cramps, expulsion, complete or partial uterine perforation, infertility caused by pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), and an increased risk for septic and spontaneous abortion in cases of pregnancy with an IUD in situ. A potentially serious complication is the perforation of the uterus, with reported incidence of 0.5-1/1000 insertions. After perforation, devices have been found in various locations in the pelvis and abdomen. Between 2000 and 2008 there were five cases with mislocated intrauterine devices in our clinic. All patients were operated by laparoscopy and there was one conversion into laparotomy. Three patients were breast-feeding at the time. An average time between insertion and recognizing expulsion was 19.2 months. Missing strings during gynaecologic examination are the first sign of an expulsion. Transvaginal sonography combined with abdominal X-ray, is necessary to reach a definitive diagnosis. Laparoscopic treatment may be appropriate in most cases. IUD is a safe and effective method of contraceptive but its insertion may be connected with serious complications.
Similar articles
-
Diagnosis and management of intra-abdominal, mislocated intrauterine devices.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010 Jun;281(6):1019-22. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1374-8. Epub 2010 Feb 16. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010. PMID: 20157719
-
[Intrauterine contraceptive device in an appendix--a case report].Ginekol Pol. 2012 Feb;83(2):132-5. Ginekol Pol. 2012. PMID: 22568359 Polish.
-
Uterine perforation by copper intrauterine device.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1984 Jun;17(4):257-61. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(84)90068-6. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1984. PMID: 6378687
-
Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. II. Diagnostic methods, prevention, and management.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1981 Aug;36(8):401-17. doi: 10.1097/00006254-198108000-00001. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1981. PMID: 6455610 Review.
-
Migration of intrauterine devices: radiologic findings and implications for patient care.Radiographics. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):335-52. doi: 10.1148/rg.322115068. Radiographics. 2012. PMID: 22411936 Review.
Cited by
-
An unusual presentation of perforated intrauterine contraceptive device.Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013 Apr;3(2):274-6. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.113678. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013. PMID: 23919205 Free PMC article.
-
Intrauterine contraceptive device embedded in the omentum - case report.Int J Womens Health. 2015 Dec 1;7:945-8. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S83336. eCollection 2015. Int J Womens Health. 2015. PMID: 26664227 Free PMC article.
-
Restoration of fertility after removal of extrauterine mirena coil: a case report and review of the literature.Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:189565. doi: 10.1155/2011/189565. Epub 2011 Aug 16. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 22567494 Free PMC article.