Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2010 Feb 1;14(1):43-8.
doi: 10.1007/BF03256352.

Response to rituximab and timeframe to relapse in rheumatoid arthritis patients: association with B-cell markers

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Response to rituximab and timeframe to relapse in rheumatoid arthritis patients: association with B-cell markers

Athina Pyrpasopoulou et al. Mol Diagn Ther. .

Abstract

Objective: Rituximab is used to deplete B cells and control disease activity, mainly in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have not responded to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. Response rates and time to relapse vary significantly among treated individuals. The objective of this study was to monitor the response of seropositive and seronegative RA patients to rituximab and correlate relapse with B-cell markers in the two groups.

Methods: Seventeen RA patients (eight seropositive for rheumatoid factor [RF+] and nine seronegative [RF-]) were treated with two cycles of rituximab. After treatment, all patients were re-evaluated at the outpatient clinic, and rituximab was readministered when disease relapse was confirmed by clinical-laboratory measures (Disease Activity Score [DAS]-28). CD20+ cells and CD20 receptor expression levels were estimated at initiation, relapse, and re-evaluation timepoints, and were compared between the two groups.

Results: Seropositive patients responded favorably to treatment compared with the seronegative group. The mean time to relapse was 337.5 +/- 127.0 days for the RF+ patients versus 233.3 +/- 59.6 days for the RF- patients (p = 0.043), despite more aggressive concomitant treatment in the seronegative group. The DAS28 decrease 3 months after treatment was 1.695 +/- 1.076 in seropositive patients versus 0.94 +/- 1.62 in seronegative patients. At relapse, CD20 receptor expression (molecules/cell) was higher in RF+ patients than in their RF- counterparts, despite a significantly lower percentage of CD20+ cells.

Conclusion: Rituximab treatment is efficient in both seropositive and seronegative RA. However, seropositive RA patients tend to respond favorably compared with seronegative patients. The differential CD20 receptor expression in the two groups at relapse potentially suggests a different pathogenetic mechanism of relapse and merits further investigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Oct;58(10):2993-9 - PubMed
    1. Curr Opin Immunol. 2008 Aug;20(4):444-9 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10(3):208 - PubMed
    1. J Immunol. 2006 Nov 15;177(10):7435-43 - PubMed
    1. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2007 Oct;9(5):401-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources