Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;28(1):18-23.
doi: 10.3109/02813430903281758.

Reasons for ordering laboratory tests and relationship with frequency of abnormal results

Affiliations

Reasons for ordering laboratory tests and relationship with frequency of abnormal results

Paul H H Houben et al. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: Laboratory tests are ordered on a daily basis, even though disease probability is often very low. Abnormal results, especially mildly abnormal results, can be difficult to interpret in these circumstances. Further insights into the occurrence of abnormalities can help improve rational test ordering and test interpretation. The objective was therefore to examine the frequency of mildly and markedly abnormal results and their relationship with physicians' reasons for ordering tests.

Design: Prospective study. Participants. A total of 87 primary care physicians in the Netherlands collected data on 1775 patients.

Main outcome measures: The physicians recorded the reason for ordering the tests, the most probable diagnosis and the pretest probability. The laboratories' reference values and specified "action limits" were used to assess the number of abnormal results and markedly abnormal results, respectively.

Results: Laboratory results were received for 1621 patients and 15,603 tests were reported (mean 9.6). The proportion of abnormal test results increased with increasing pretest probability (from 13.9% to 34.7%) and was 13.4% for tests ordered to reassure the patient and 13.3% for psychosocial diagnoses. The proportion of patients with at least one abnormal test result was high: 53.1% for tests ordered to reassure and 57.7% in patients with low pretest probability. Corresponding values for a marked abnormality were 11.1% and 12.4%, respectively.

Conclusion: Abnormal laboratory test results were frequent, even when pretest probability was low. Physicians should therefore carefully consider when tests are necessary. Future research could explore physicians' interpretation of test results and its impact on diagnosis and management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vafiadis P. The dilemma of the unexpected result. Aust Fam Physician. 1996;25:971–3. - PubMed
    1. Deyo RA. Cascade effects of medical technology. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:23–44. Epub 2001 Oct 25. - PubMed
    1. Sherwood P, Lyburn I, Brown S, Ryder S. How are abnormal results for liver function tests dealt with in primary care? Audit of yield and impact. BMJ. 2001;322:276–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Little P, Cantrell T, Roberts L, Chapman J, Langridge J, Pickering R. Why do GPs perform investigations? The medical and social agendas in arranging back X-rays. Fam Pract. 1998;15:264–5. - PubMed
    1. Aiarzaguena JM, Grandes G, Salazar A, Gaminde I, Sanchez A. The diagnostic challenges presented by patients with medically unexplained symptoms in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26:99–105. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources