Reasons for ordering laboratory tests and relationship with frequency of abnormal results
- PMID: 20121652
- PMCID: PMC3440609
- DOI: 10.3109/02813430903281758
Reasons for ordering laboratory tests and relationship with frequency of abnormal results
Abstract
Objective: Laboratory tests are ordered on a daily basis, even though disease probability is often very low. Abnormal results, especially mildly abnormal results, can be difficult to interpret in these circumstances. Further insights into the occurrence of abnormalities can help improve rational test ordering and test interpretation. The objective was therefore to examine the frequency of mildly and markedly abnormal results and their relationship with physicians' reasons for ordering tests.
Design: Prospective study. Participants. A total of 87 primary care physicians in the Netherlands collected data on 1775 patients.
Main outcome measures: The physicians recorded the reason for ordering the tests, the most probable diagnosis and the pretest probability. The laboratories' reference values and specified "action limits" were used to assess the number of abnormal results and markedly abnormal results, respectively.
Results: Laboratory results were received for 1621 patients and 15,603 tests were reported (mean 9.6). The proportion of abnormal test results increased with increasing pretest probability (from 13.9% to 34.7%) and was 13.4% for tests ordered to reassure the patient and 13.3% for psychosocial diagnoses. The proportion of patients with at least one abnormal test result was high: 53.1% for tests ordered to reassure and 57.7% in patients with low pretest probability. Corresponding values for a marked abnormality were 11.1% and 12.4%, respectively.
Conclusion: Abnormal laboratory test results were frequent, even when pretest probability was low. Physicians should therefore carefully consider when tests are necessary. Future research could explore physicians' interpretation of test results and its impact on diagnosis and management.
Similar articles
-
Pretest expectations strongly influence interpretation of abnormal laboratory results and further management.BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Feb 16;11:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-13. BMC Fam Pract. 2010. PMID: 20158908 Free PMC article.
-
Cascade effects of laboratory testing are found to be rare in low disease probability situations: prospective cohort study.J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;63(4):452-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Oct 31. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010. PMID: 19880283
-
Mean Abnormal Result Rate: Proof of Concept of a New Metric for Benchmarking Selectivity in Laboratory Test Ordering.Am J Clin Pathol. 2016 Apr;145(4):568-73. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqw041. Epub 2016 Apr 26. Am J Clin Pathol. 2016. PMID: 27124949
-
Large differences in laboratory utilisation between hospitals in Sweden.Clin Chem Lab Med. 2000 May;38(5):383-9. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2000.056. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2000. PMID: 10952220 Review.
-
A Primer on Rheumatologic Laboratory Tests: What They Mean and When to Order Them.Prim Care. 2018 Jun;45(2):181-191. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2018.02.002. Prim Care. 2018. PMID: 29759119 Review.
Cited by
-
The complementary nature of query-based and directed health information exchange in primary care practice.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jan 1;27(1):73-80. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz134. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020. PMID: 31592529 Free PMC article.
-
Re-Purposing the Ordering of Routine Laboratory Tests in Hospitalized Medical Patients (RePORT): protocol for a multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial to evaluate the impact of a multicomponent intervention bundle to reduce laboratory test over-utilization.Implement Sci. 2024 Jul 2;19(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01376-6. Implement Sci. 2024. PMID: 38956637 Free PMC article.
-
Targeting repetitive laboratory testing with electronic health records-embedded predictive decision support: A pre-implementation study.Clin Biochem. 2023 Mar;113:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 7. Clin Biochem. 2023. PMID: 36623759 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term follow-up of patients with elevated serum calcium concentrations in Swedish primary care.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013 Dec;31(4):248-54. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2013.861152. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013. PMID: 24299047 Free PMC article.
-
'I'm fishing really'--inflammatory marker testing in primary care: a qualitative study.Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Mar;66(644):e200-6. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X683857. Epub 2016 Feb 7. Br J Gen Pract. 2016. PMID: 26852797 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Vafiadis P. The dilemma of the unexpected result. Aust Fam Physician. 1996;25:971–3. - PubMed
-
- Deyo RA. Cascade effects of medical technology. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:23–44. Epub 2001 Oct 25. - PubMed
-
- Little P, Cantrell T, Roberts L, Chapman J, Langridge J, Pickering R. Why do GPs perform investigations? The medical and social agendas in arranging back X-rays. Fam Pract. 1998;15:264–5. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources