Bond strength of ceramic brackets with various bonding systems
- PMID: 2012320
- DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1991)061<0035:BSOCBW>2.0.CO;2
Bond strength of ceramic brackets with various bonding systems
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the shear and tensile bond strengths of various ceramic and ceramic-filled brackets in combination with commonly used bonding systems. One monocrystalline, two polycrystalline and one ceramic-filled plastic bracket types were tested in combination with one light-cured and two chemically-cured bonding systems. Bonding procedures were performed on properly prepared human teeth. Shear and tensile tests were performed on an Instron test machine. The shear bond strength of the mono- and polycrystalline ceramic brackets was not affected by the bonding system. There was a difference among bonding systems used with the ceramic-filled plastic bracket. Ceramic-filled plastic and polycrystalline ceramic brackets exhibited the greatest resistance to tensile force, while monocrystalline brackets showed the highest propensity for tensile fracture of the wings.
Similar articles
-
Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Feb;135(2):194-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.12.024. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009. PMID: 19201326 Clinical Trial.
-
Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets to resin-composite surfaces.Aust Orthod J. 1997 Oct;15(1):10-5. Aust Orthod J. 1997. PMID: 9528397
-
Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.Eur J Orthod. 2010 Jun;32(3):274-80. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp098. Epub 2009 Nov 10. Eur J Orthod. 2010. PMID: 19903729
-
A comparison of three bracket bases: an in vitro study.Br J Orthod. 1991 Feb;18(1):29-35. doi: 10.1179/bjo.18.1.29. Br J Orthod. 1991. PMID: 1827348 Review.
-
Orthodontic Attachment Adhesion to Ceramic Surfaces.Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2021 Mar 17;13:83-95. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S302770. eCollection 2021. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2021. PMID: 33762853 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Enamel Surface Damage following Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: A Hospital-Based Study.ScientificWorldJournal. 2021 May 6;2021:5561040. doi: 10.1155/2021/5561040. eCollection 2021. ScientificWorldJournal. 2021. PMID: 34035672 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of self-etching primer/adhesive and conventional bonding on the shear bond strength in metallic and ceramic brackets.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Jan 1;17(1):e164-70. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17024. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012. PMID: 21743430 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of enamel conditioning on the shear bond strength of different adhesives.J Orofac Orthop. 2010 Nov;71(6):411-20. doi: 10.1007/s00056-010-1036-2. Epub 2010 Nov 17. J Orofac Orthop. 2010. PMID: 21082304 English, German.
-
Evaluating the Type of Light Transmittance in Mono Crystalline, Poly Crystalline and Sapphire Brackets- An Invitro Spectrofluorometer Study.J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Aug;10(8):ZC18-21. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18599.8230. Epub 2016 Aug 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016. PMID: 27656556 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanical properties and surface characterization of translucent composite wire following topical fluoride treatment.Angle Orthod. 2012 Jan;82(1):8-13. doi: 10.2319/030811-168.1. Epub 2011 Jun 30. Angle Orthod. 2012. PMID: 21721949 Free PMC article.