Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jan;3(1):15-24.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.864736. Epub 2009 Dec 8.

Regional variation in carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy in the Medicare population

Philip P Goodney  1 , Lori L Travis, David Malenka, Kristen K Bronner, F Lee Lucas, Jack L Cronenwett, David C Goodman, Elliott S Fisher
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Regional variation in carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy in the Medicare population

Philip P Goodney et al. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Background: To describe geographic variation in population-based rates of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed in Medicare beneficiaries.

Methods and results: Medicare claims and enrollment data were used to calculate age, sex, and race-adjusted rates of CAS and CEA for Medicare beneficiaries in each of 306 hospital referral regions between 1998 and 2007. Procedures were identified using a combination of Current Procedural Terminology codes as well as diagnostic and procedural ICD-9 codes. Overall, the rate of carotid revascularization has fallen slightly over the last decade (3.8 procedures per 1000 in 1998, 3.1 procedures per 1000 in 2007; P<0.0001). Although the use of CEA decreased, from 3.6 to 2.5 procedures per 1000 beneficiaries in 2007 (P<0.0001), the use of CAS has increased >4-fold between 1998 and 2007, growing from 0.1 to 0.6 CAS procedures per 1000 beneficiaries (P<0.0001). Further, CAS rapidly disseminated across the country over the last decade. In 1998, 66% of hospital referral regions had a hospital that performed CAS; however, by 2007, nearly all (95%) hospital referral regions performed CAS (P<0.0001). Last, in regions with the highest utilization rates of CAS, it appeared that CAS was performed as a substitute for CEA. There was little evidence that CAS was being performed in addition to CEA, as no correlation existed between regional rates of CAS and CEA (r=0.06).

Conclusions: Even though CEA was used less frequently in 2007 than 1998, the use of CAS has grown significantly. Although regional variation in the use of CEA has remained fairly constant, regional variation has increased in the use of CAS. Given these changes in practice patterns, careful examination of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of CAS is necessary.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Coding strategy designed to capture for CEA and CAS procedures performed specifically for atherosclerotic disease.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Rates of total carotid revascularization, CEA, and CAS in Medicare patients, 1998 to 2007.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A, HRR-level rates of overall carotid revascularization rates in Medicare patients in 1998. B, HRR-level rates of overall carotid revascularization rates in Medicare patients in 2007.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A, HRR-level rates of overall carotid revascularization rates in Medicare patients in 1998. B, HRR-level rates of overall carotid revascularization rates in Medicare patients in 2007.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A, HRR-based rates of CEA, 1998 to 2007. B, HRR-based rates of CEA, 1998 and 2007.
Figure 5
Figure 5
A, HRR-based rates of CAS, 1998 to 2007. B, HRR-based rates of CAS, 1998 and 2007.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Regional rates (1998 and 2007) of CEA and CAS in the 10 highest rate regions for CAS in 1998.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Correlation between CEA and CAS by region, 2007.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA. 1995;273:1421–1428. - PubMed
    1. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid End-arterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445–453. - PubMed
    1. Goodney PP, Schermerhorn ML, Powell RJ. Current status of carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:406–411. - PubMed
    1. Wholey MH, Al-Mubarek N. Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Intervent. 2003;60:259–266. - PubMed
    1. Goullard L, Gommeaux A, Poncelet P, Lenica D, Durand P, Dieux C. [Asymptomatic carotid stenoses: a cardiologist's viewpoint.] Ann Cardiol Angeiol. 2004;53:54–59. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms