End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences
- PMID: 20124172
- PMCID: PMC2834470
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4672
End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences
Abstract
Purpose: Physicians have an ethical obligation to honor patients' values for care, including at the end of life (EOL). We sought to evaluate factors that help patients to receive care consistent with their preferences.
Methods: This was a longitudinal multi-institutional cohort study. We measured baseline preferences for life-extending versus symptom-directed care and actual EOL care received in 325 patients with advanced cancer. We also measured associated sociodemographic, health, and communication characteristics, including EOL discussions between patients and physicians.
Results: Preferences were assessed a median of 125 days before death. Overall, 68% of patients (220 of 325 patients) received EOL care consistent with baseline preferences. The proportion was slightly higher among patients who recognized they were terminally ill (74%, 90 of 121 patients; P = .05). Patients who recognized their terminal illness were more likely to prefer symptom-directed care (83%, 100 of 121 patients; v 66%, 127 of 191 patients; P = .003). However, some patients who were aware they were terminally ill wished to receive life-extending care (17%, 21 of 121 patients). Patients who reported having discussed their wishes for EOL care with a physician (39%, 125 of 322 patients) were more likely to receive care that was consistent with their preferences, both in the full sample (odds ratio [OR] = 2.26; P < .0001) and among patients who were aware they were terminally ill (OR = 3.94; P = .0005). Among patients who received no life-extending measures, physical distress was lower (mean score, 3.1 v 4.1; P = .03) among patients for whom such care was consistent with preferences.
Conclusion: Patients with cancer are more likely to receive EOL care that is consistent with their preferences when they have had the opportunity to discuss their wishes for EOL care with a physician.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Factors Predisposing Terminally Ill Cancer Patients' Preferences for Distinct Patterns/States of Life-Sustaining Treatments Over Their Last Six Months.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Feb;57(2):190-198.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Nov 15. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019. PMID: 30447386
-
Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatments and Associations With Accurate Prognostic Awareness and Depressive Symptoms in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients' Last Year of Life.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Jan;51(1):41-51.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Sep 18. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016. PMID: 26386187
-
Accurate Prognostic Awareness Facilitates, Whereas Better Quality of Life and More Anxiety Symptoms Hinder End-of-Life Care Discussions: A Longitudinal Survey Study in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients' Last Six Months of Life.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Apr;55(4):1068-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.12.485. Epub 2017 Dec 29. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018. PMID: 29289656
-
Straddling the fence: ICU nurses advocating for hospice care.Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2012 Mar;24(1):105-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2012.01.006. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2012. PMID: 22405716 Review.
-
Communication in palliative care: talking about the end of life, before the end of life.Postgrad Med J. 2016 Aug;92(1090):466-70. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133368. Epub 2016 May 6. Postgrad Med J. 2016. PMID: 27153866 Review.
Cited by
-
Obtaining Helpful Information From the Internet About Prognosis in Advanced Cancer.J Oncol Pract. 2015 Jul;11(4):327-31. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.004739. J Oncol Pract. 2015. PMID: 26188047 Free PMC article.
-
Association of goals of care meetings for hospitalized cancer patients at risk for critical care with patient outcomes.Palliat Med. 2015 Apr;29(4):386-90. doi: 10.1177/0269216314560800. Epub 2014 Dec 19. Palliat Med. 2015. PMID: 25527528 Free PMC article.
-
Greater preferences for death in hospital and mechanical ventilation at the end of life among non-whites recently diagnosed with cancer.Support Care Cancer. 2021 Nov;29(11):6555-6564. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06226-5. Epub 2021 Apr 29. Support Care Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33913005 Free PMC article.
-
Relationships Between Advanced Cancer Patients' Worry About Dying and Illness Understanding, Treatment Preferences, and Advance Care Planning.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Apr;61(4):723-731.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 12. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021. PMID: 32926962 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Latent classes of prognosis conversations in palliative care: a mixed-methods study.J Palliat Med. 2013 Jun;16(6):653-60. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0381. Epub 2013 May 9. J Palliat Med. 2013. PMID: 23659459 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Haidet P, Hamel MB, Davis RB, et al. Outcomes, preferences for resuscitation, and physician-patient communication among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: SUPPORT Investigators—Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Am J Med. 1998;105:222–229. - PubMed
-
- Weeks JC, Cook EF, O'Day SJ, et al. Relationship between cancer patients' predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences. JAMA. 1998;279:1709–1714. - PubMed
-
- Earle CC, Park ER, Lai B, et al. Identifying Potential Indicators of the Quality of End-of-Life Cancer Care From Administrative Data. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:1133–1138. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical