Outcomes of carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis: a single neurovascular center retrospective review of 101 consecutive patients
- PMID: 20124935
- DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000365008.17803.AD
Outcomes of carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients with carotid artery stenosis: a single neurovascular center retrospective review of 101 consecutive patients
Abstract
Objective: Carotid artery angioplasty and carotid artery stenting (CAS) offer a viable alternative to carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients; however, the complication rates associated with CAS may be higher than previously documented. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of CAS in high surgical risk patients in a single neurovascular center retrospective review.
Methods: An institutional review board-approved retrospective review of the clinical variables and treatment outcomes of 101 consecutive patients (109 stents) from July 2001 to March 2007 with carotid stenosis were analyzed. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic stenoses were studied in high surgical risk patients as defined by the SAPPHIRE (Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High-Risk for Endarterectomy) trial. Specifically, those patients with clinically significant cardiac disease (congestive heart failure, abnormal stress test, or need for open-heart surgery), severe pulmonary disease, contralateral carotid occlusion, contralateral laryngeal nerve palsy, recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy, previous radical neck surgery, or radiation therapy to the neck, and an age older than 80.
Results: Seventy-four percent of the patients were symptomatic (n = 81), and the mean stenosis in symptomatic patients was 83%. Reasons for stenting included cardiac/pulmonary/medical risk (60%), contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion (8%), recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy (11%), carotid dissection (6%), age older than 80 (7%), previous radical neck surgery (7%), and previous neck radiation (1%). Stent deployment was achieved in 108 of 109 vessels (99%). Distal embolic protection devices were used in 72% of cases treated. The overall rate of in-hospital adverse events (transient ischemic attack, intracranial hemorrhage, minor stroke, major stroke, myocardial infarction, and death) was 8.3% (9 of 109). Of these events, 2 patients (1.8%) experienced a hemispheric transient ischemic attack (neurological symptoms that resolved within 24 hours), 2 others (1.8%) had transiently symptomatic acute reperfusion syndrome. The 30-day stroke/death/myocardial infarction risk was 4.6% (n = 5). Of these patients, 3 had minor strokes (2.7%) defined as a modified Rankin Scale score less than 3 at 1-year follow-up, 1 had a major stroke (0.9%) defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 3 or more at 1-year follow-up, and 1 patient died after a periprocedural myocardial infarction (0.9%).
Conclusion: CAS can be performed with a low 30-day complication rate, even with a higher percentage of symptomatic lesions. The results support the use of CAS in high surgical risk patients with both significant symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery disease.
Similar articles
-
Safety of latest-generation self-expanding stents in patients with NASCET-ineligible severe symptomatic extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.Arch Neurol. 2004 Jan;61(1):39-43. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.1.39. Arch Neurol. 2004. PMID: 14732618
-
Carotid endarterectomy in SAPPHIRE-eligible high-risk patients: implications for selecting patients for carotid angioplasty and stenting.J Vasc Surg. 2004 May;39(5):958-65; discussion 965-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.12.037. J Vasc Surg. 2004. PMID: 15111844
-
Carotid artery stenting in surgical high-risk patients.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Apr;67(4):513-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20640. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006. PMID: 16534816 Clinical Trial.
-
Internal carotid artery stenting in patients over 80 years of age: single-center experience and review of the literature.J Neuroimaging. 2009 Apr;19(2):158-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2008.00269.x. Epub 2008 Sep 17. J Neuroimaging. 2009. PMID: 18800998 Review.
-
Carotid artery stenting vs. endarterectomy.Eur Heart J. 2009 Nov;30(22):2693-704. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp471. Epub 2009 Oct 27. Eur Heart J. 2009. PMID: 19861324 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of baseline characteristics on outcomes of carotid artery stenting in acute ischemic stroke patients.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016 Mar 31;12:495-504. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S104933. eCollection 2016. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016. PMID: 27099508 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term outcome in patients with carotid artery stenting and contralateral carotid occlusion: a single neurovascular center prospective analysis.Neuroradiology. 2012 Sep;54(9):965-72. doi: 10.1007/s00234-011-0974-8. Epub 2011 Nov 3. Neuroradiology. 2012. PMID: 22048419
-
First-ever ischemic stroke in elderly patients: predictors of functional outcome following carotid artery stenting.Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Jul 26;11:985-95. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S111637. eCollection 2016. Clin Interv Aging. 2016. PMID: 27555753 Free PMC article.
-
Carotid artery stenting: a single center "real world" experience.PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035300. Epub 2012 Apr 30. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22558138 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 17;11(16):4819. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164819. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36013058 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources