Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov 1;135(11):1192.
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000085.

Synthetic Musk Fragrances in a Conventional Drinking Water Treatment Plant with Lime Softening

Affiliations

Synthetic Musk Fragrances in a Conventional Drinking Water Treatment Plant with Lime Softening

William D Wombacher et al. J Environ Eng (New York). .

Abstract

Synthetic musk fragrances are common personal care product additives and wastewater contaminants that are routinely detected in the environment. This study examines the presence eight synthetic musk fragrances (AHTN, HHCB, ATII, ADBI, AHMI, musk xylene, and musk ketone) in source water and the removal of these compounds as they flow through a Midwestern conventional drinking water plant with lime softening. The compounds were measured in water, waste sludge, and air throughout the plant. HHCB and AHTN were detected in 100% of the samples and at the highest concentrations. A mass balance on HHCB and AHTN was performed under warm and cold weather conditions. The total removal efficiency for HHCB and AHTN, which averaged between 67% to 89%, is dominated by adsorption to water softener sludge and its consequent removal by sludge wasting and media filtration. Volatilization, chlorine disinfection, and the disposal of backwash water play a minor role in the removal of both compounds. As a result of inefficient overall removal, HHCB and AHTN are a constant presence at low levels in finished drinking water.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
University of Iowa Water Treatment Plant diagram and water sampling locations (red circles)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Average concentrations of AHTN and HHCB measured at four locations in the drinking water plant. Each location was sampled fourteen times throughout the year (n = 14). The error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Water plant mass balance

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Reiner JL, Kannan K. A survey of polycyclic musks in selected household commodities from the United States. Chemosphere. 2006;62:867–873. - PubMed
    1. Yamagishi T, Miyazaki T, Horii S, Kaneko S. Identification of musk xylene and musk ketone in freshwater fish collected from the Tama River, (Tokyo) Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1981;26:656–662. - PubMed
    1. Peck AM, Hornbuckle KC. Synthetic musk fragrances in Lake Michigan. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38:367–372. - PubMed
    1. Rimkus GG. Polycyclic musk fragrances in the aquatic environment. Toxicology Letters. 1999;111:37–56. - PubMed
    1. Kolpin DW, Skopec M, Meyer MT, Furlong ET, Zaugg SD. Urban contribution of pharmaceuticals and other organic wastewater contaminants to streams during differing flow conditions. Sci Tot Environ. 2004;328:119–130. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources