Advantages of a non-linear frequency compression algorithm in noise
- PMID: 20127102
- DOI: 10.1007/s00405-009-1170-x
Advantages of a non-linear frequency compression algorithm in noise
Abstract
A multichannel non-linear frequency compression algorithm was evaluated in comparison to conventional amplification hearing aids using a test of speech understanding in noise (Oldenburger Satztest-OLSA) and subjective questionnaires. The new algorithm compresses frequencies above a pre-calculated cut off frequency and shifts them to a lower frequency range, thereby providing high-frequency audibility. Low-frequencies, below the compression cut off frequency, are amplified normally. This algorithm is called SoundRecover (SR). In this study, 11 experienced hearing aid users with a severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss were tested. Seven subjects showed enhanced levels of understanding in noise (OLSA) using frequency compression. However, 4 out of the 11 subjects could not benefit from the high-frequency gain. Evaluation using questionnaires demonstrated an increased level of satisfaction after 2 months of experimental devices wearing (p = 0.08) and after 4 months of wearing (p = 0.09), respectively, compared to conventional hearing instruments.
Similar articles
-
A digital filterbank hearing aid: predicting user preference and performance for two signal processing algorithms.Ear Hear. 1997 Feb;18(1):12-25. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199702000-00002. Ear Hear. 1997. PMID: 9058034
-
Improvements in speech perception with an experimental nonlinear frequency compression hearing device.Int J Audiol. 2005 May;44(5):281-92. doi: 10.1080/14992020500060636. Int J Audiol. 2005. PMID: 16028791
-
A digital filterbank hearing aid: three digital signal processing algorithms--user preference and performance.Ear Hear. 1997 Oct;18(5):373-87. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199710000-00003. Ear Hear. 1997. PMID: 9360861
-
A comparison of conventional and in-situ audiometry on participants with varying levels of sensorineural hearing loss.J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Jan;26(1):68-79. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.1.8. J Am Acad Audiol. 2015. PMID: 25597462 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.Ear Hear. 1998 Apr;19(2):131-8. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199804000-00005. Ear Hear. 1998. PMID: 9562535
Cited by
-
A Pilot Study on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Children: Aided CAEPs Reflect Improved High-Frequency Audibility with Frequency Compression Hearing Aid Technology.Int J Otolaryngol. 2012;2012:982894. doi: 10.1155/2012/982894. Epub 2012 Oct 31. Int J Otolaryngol. 2012. PMID: 23197983 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Frequency Transposition and Frequency Compression for People With Extensive Dead Regions in the Cochlea.Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216518822206. doi: 10.1177/2331216518822206. Trends Hear. 2019. PMID: 30803386 Free PMC article.
-
Harmonic Frequency Lowering: Effects on the Perception of Music Detail and Sound Quality.Trends Hear. 2016 Feb 1;20:2331216515626131. doi: 10.1177/2331216515626131. Trends Hear. 2016. PMID: 26834122 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression on ACC Amplitude and Listener Performance.Ear Hear. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):e261-70. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000177. Ear Hear. 2015. PMID: 25951048 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of frequency compression and frequency transposition on fricative and affricate perception in listeners with normal hearing and mild to moderate hearing loss.Ear Hear. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):519-32. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000040. Ear Hear. 2014. PMID: 24699702 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials