Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb 15;116(4 Suppl):1134-45.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.24802.

Improving the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with antibody-targeted radionuclides

Affiliations

Improving the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with antibody-targeted radionuclides

Robert M Sharkey et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Radioimmunotherapy of non-Hodgkin lymphoma comprises a (90)Y- or (131)I-labeled murine anti-CD20 IgG, but both agents also include a substantial dose of unlabeled anti-CD20 IgG given immediately before the radioconjugate to reduce its uptake in the spleen (primary normal B-cell antigen sink); this extends its plasma half-life and improves tumor visualization. Thus, these treatments combine an effective anti-CD20 radioconjugate with an unconjugated anti-CD20 antibody that is also therapeutically active, but the large anti-CD20 IgG predose ( approximately 900 mg) may diminish the tumor localization of the radioimmunoconjugate (eg, 10-35 mg). We have examined alternative approaches that enhance radionuclide targeting and improve antitumor responses. One uses a (90)Y-labeled anti-CD22 IgG (epratuzumab) combined with an antibody therapy regimen of a humanized anti-CD20 IgG (veltuzumab). Pretargeted radionuclide therapy using a trivalent, humanized, recombinant bispecific anti-CD20 antibody with a (90)Y-hapten-peptide is another highly effective method that is also less toxic than directly radiolabeled IgG. Finally, all approaches benefit from the addition of a consolidation-dosing regimen of the anti-CD20 IgG antibody. This article reviews these various options and discusses how some fundamental changes could potentially enhance the response and duration from radionuclide-targeted therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The effect of veltuzumab pre-dosing on the therapeutic response of 90Y-veltuzumab. Groups of nude mice (n = 10) bearing s.c. Ramos human B-cell lymphoma xenografts (average 0.65 cm3) were administered 0.115 mCi of 90Y-veltuzumab (0.05 mg) alone or they were given 1.0 mg of veltuzumab 1 day prior to 90Y-veltuzumab treatment. Survival based on time for tumors to progress to 3.0 cm3.
Figure 2
Figure 2
90Y-veltuzumab therapy with consolidation veltuzumab therapy. Nude mice bearing s.c. Ramos tumors were given 90Y-veltuzumab alone (0.13 mCi/0.05 mg), or a reduced veltuzumab pre-dose of 0.25 mg was given 1 day before receiving 90Y-veltuzumab, and another group received the pre-dose, as well as a veltuzumab consolidation therapy starting 1 week after the radioconjugate using 1.0 mg veltuzumab followed by 3 more weekly injections of 0.5 mg veltuzumab. Survival based on time to progression to 3.0 cm3.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Combination RAIT and antibody therapy using 90Y-epratuzumab and unlabeled veltuzumab. Treatment was initiated once the s.c. Ramos xenographs were visible in BALB/c nude mice. Treatment consisted of 90Y-epratuzumab (90Y-E) alone, veltuzumab (V) alone (1 mg followed 1 week later with 3 more weekly injections of 0.5 mg), or 90Y-E combined with V therapy that was started 1 day before the radioconjugate. An irrelevant 90Y-anti-CEA IgG was given to assess non-specific radiation effects.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Veltuzumab antibody therapy enhances the response of 90Y-epratuzumab even when started 1 week after the radioconjugate treatment. Growth curves of the individual animals with s.c. Ramos xenografts treated with 90Y-epratuzumab alone or with veltuzumab therapy initiated either 1 day before (day-1) or 6 days after the radioconjugate dose.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Consolidation veltuzumab therapy improves response of 90Y-veltuzumab, but only when given in the absence of a pre-dose, or as in Figure 2, when the pre-dose is minimized. Ramos-bearing nude mice were given 0.13 mCi of 90Y-veltuzumab alone or animals received 1.0 mg of veltuzumab prior to the radioconjugate, which was then followed with 3 additional weekly injections of 0.5 mg of veltuzumab (pre & post hA20). Other animals received the same veltuzumab regimen, but it was started 1 week after the radioconjugate was given.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Veltuzumab bsMAb pretargeted 90Y-hapten-peptide improves therapeutic response compared to directly radiolabeled 90Y-veltuzumab. Nude mice bearing s.c. Ramos tumors were treated with the MTD of 90Y-veltuzumab (0.13 mCi/0.05 mg) or a pretargeting procedure using a humanized, recombinant bispecific antibody containing 2 veltuzumab Fab fragments and one anti-hapten Fab fragment capable of binding the 90Y-hapten peptide. 0.5 or 0.7 mCi of the pretargeted 90Y-hapten-peptide only result in ~50–70% loss in WBC that recovers in several weeks, whereas 0.13 mCi of 90Y-veltuzumab causes >90% loss in WBC that requires 7 weeks to recover. Growth curves and the subsequent survival curve shows the improved responses in the pretargeted animals with the ability to completely ablate 9/10 tumors at the 0.7 mCi 90Y-hapten-peptide dose.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The effect of veltuzumab pre-dosing and consolidation therapy on a veltuzumab-bsMAb pretargeting procedure. (A) Administering 1.0 mg of veltuzumab 1 day before the injection of the veltuzumab bsMAb reduces efficacy of the pretargeting procedure using 0.25 mCi of the 90Y-hapten-peptide, despite the use of additional veltuzumab therapy after the pretargeted 90Y-hapten peptide was given. (B) minimizing the veltuzumab pre-dose to 0.25 mg restores the anti-tumor effects of the pretargeting procedure, even improving it in this study. (C) Adding a full veltuzumab consolidation therapy after the pretargeted therapy (i.e., 1.0 mg veltuzumab starting 1 week after the 90Y-hapten peptide, followed by 3 weekly doses of 0.5 mg veltuzumab) improves response, even when animals were pre-dosed with 0.25 mg veltuzumab.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Veltuzumab consolidation therapy enhances anti-tumor response in SCID mice bearing RL human lymphoma xenografts. SCID mice received 0.125 mCi of veltuzumab bsMAb pretargeted 90Y-hapten-peptide alone, or they were given a 0.25 mg pre-dose of veltuzumab 1 day before the bsMAb injection, as well as receiving a full veltuzumab consolidation therapy (1.0 mg + 3 × 0.5 mg) starting 1 week after the 90Y-hapten-peptide. (TRT, treatment-related toxicity in pretargeting alone group).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Davies AJ. Radioimmunotherapy for B-cell lymphoma: Y90 ibritumomab tiuxetan and I131 tositumomab. Oncogene. 2007;26:3614–3628. - PubMed
    1. Press OW. Evidence mounts for the efficacy of radioimmunotherapy for B-cell lymphomas. J Clin Oncol. 2008 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buchegger F, Press OW, Delaloye AB, Ketterer N. Radiolabeled and native antibodies and the prospect of cure of follicular lymphoma. Oncologist. 2008;13:657–667. - PubMed
    1. Witzig TE, Gordon LI, Cabanillas F, et al. Randomized controlled trial of yttrium-90-labeled ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy versus rituximab immunotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory low-grade, follicular, or transformed B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2453–2463. - PubMed
    1. Davis TA, Kaminski MS, Leonard JP, et al. The radioisotope contributes significantly to the activity of radioimmunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:7792–7798. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources