Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul;8(7):1486-91.
doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03795.x. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

Heparin-induced non-necrotizing skin lesions: rarely associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Affiliations
Free article

Heparin-induced non-necrotizing skin lesions: rarely associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

M Schindewolf et al. J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Jul.
Free article

Abstract

Summary background: Recently, there has been an increasing number of reports regarding adverse skin reactions to subcutaneous heparin administration. Case series have implied that heparin-induced skin lesions are predominantly associated with life-threatening heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in at least 22% of patients. Skin lesions, therefore, have been included in clinical scores for HIT.

Objectives: To determine the association of heparin-induced skin lesions with HIT. This would have a pivotal impact on further anticoagulatory management in patients with heparin-induced skin lesions.

Patients/methods: In our observational cohort study, 87 consecutive patients with heparin-induced skin lesions (85 occurring during low-molecular-weight heparin administration) were evaluated using a standardized internal protocol, including HIT diagnostics (heparin-platelet factor 4-ELISA, heparin-induced platelet activation assay), platelet count monitoring, clinical/sonographical screening for thrombosis, skin allergy testing and, if necessary, histology.

Results: None of the observed heparin-induced skin lesions was due to HIT; all lesions were caused by delayed-type IV-hypersensitivity reactions (DTH) instead. Even the cutaneous reaction in one patient with concomitant HIT could be classified histologically as DTH reaction, amounting to an association of heparin-induced skin lesions and HIT in 1.2% (1/87; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.06).

Conclusion: Heparin-induced skin lesions associated with use of low-molecular-weight heparins do not seem to be strongly associated with a systemic immunologic reaction in terms of HIT and might rather be due to DTH reactions than due to microvascular thrombosis. Hence, we propose refining existing pretest probability scores for HIT, unless underlying causes have been clarified.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in