Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec 29;10(5):114-21.
doi: 10.1016/S1567-5688(09)71824-0.

Immunoadsorption in SLE: three different high affinity columns are adequately effective in removing autoantibodies and controlling disease activity

Affiliations

Immunoadsorption in SLE: three different high affinity columns are adequately effective in removing autoantibodies and controlling disease activity

P Biesenbach et al. Atheroscler Suppl. .

Abstract

Introduction: Pathogenic autoantibodies (Abs) are a hallmark of SLE and their rapid removal is beneficial in active SLE. Immunoadsorption (IAS) is effective in removing serum levels of all classes of immunoglobulin (Ig), immune complexes (IC) and anti-dsDNA Abs and appears superior to plasmapheresis with respect to side effects. IAS can be performed with different columns, which use different ligands to bind their target. In particular, high affinity columns are in the focus of interest. Their ligands are either sheep IgG directed against human Ig (Ig-column, Ig-Therasorb®), or staphylococcal Protein A (ProtA-column, Immunosorba®), or the synthetic peptide Gam146 (GAM-column, Globaffin®). In our experience Ig-columns have been effective in treating active renal SLE. However, no analysis has so far been published on which column type should be preferred in treating SLE patients.

Patients and methods: Among our SLE patients maintained on prolonged IAS therapy, we identified those with stable renal SLE and low to moderate disease activity who were successfully treated by using Ig-columns. Six of these patients were switched to ProtA-columns, keeping the rest of the protocol and the medication constant. In addition, two patients were switched from Ig- to GAM-columns.

Results: All types of columns significantly lowered the serum levels of IgG, IgM, and anti-dsDNA Abs. Disease activity was constantly low before and after the switch, as were parameters of renal function. In addition, patients with highly active disease were effectively treated when ProtA- (n=6) or GAM-columns (n=1) were used as first-line extracorporeal treatment.

Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that all columns are adequately effective in controlling key parameters of SLE. Thus, it is not the type of the ligand, but only the outcome, i.e. the successful removal of Ig, IC, and (auto-) Abs that is required for controlling SLE activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources