Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Jan;7(1):74-80.
doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.10.018.

Substance P antagonists as a therapeutic approach to improving outcome following traumatic brain injury

Affiliations
Review

Substance P antagonists as a therapeutic approach to improving outcome following traumatic brain injury

Robert Vink et al. Neurotherapeutics. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Although a number of secondary injury factors are known to contribute to the development of morphological injury and functional deficits following traumatic brain injury, accumulating evidence has suggested that neuropeptides, and in particular substance P, may play a critical role. Substance P is released early following acute injury to the CNS as part of a neurogenic inflammatory response. In so doing, it facilitates an increase in the permeability of the blood-brain barrier and the development of vasogenic edema. At the cellular level, substance P has been shown to directly result in neuronal cell death; functionally, substance P has been implicated in learning and memory, mood and anxiety, stress mechanisms, emotion-processing, migraine, emesis, pain, and seizures, all of which may be adversely affected after brain injury. Inhibition of post-traumatic substance P activity, either by preventing release or by antagonism of the neurokinin-1 receptor, has consistently resulted in a profound decrease in development of edema and marked improvements in functional outcome. This review summarizes the current evidence supporting a role for substance P in acute brain injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tagliaferri F, Compagnone C, Korsic M, Servadei F, Kraus J. A systematic review of brain injury epidemiology in Europe. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006;148:255–268. doi: 10.1007/s00701-005-0651-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blumbergs PC, Reilly PL, Vink R. Trauma. In: Love S, Louis DN, Ellison DW, editors. Greenfield’s neuropathology. 8th ed. London: Hodder Arnold; 2008. pp. 733–832.
    1. McIntosh TK, Smith DH, Meaney DF, Kotapka MJ, Gennarelli TA, Graham DI. Neuropathological sequelae of traumatic brain injury: relationship to neurochemical and biomechanical mechanisms. Lab Invest. 1996;74:315–342. - PubMed
    1. Feickert HJ, Drommer S, Heyer R. Severe head injury in children: impact of risk factors on outcome. J Trauma. 1999;47:33–38. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199907000-00008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marmarou A, Fatouros PP, Barzó P, et al. Contribution of edema and cerebral blood volume to traumatic brain swelling in head-injured patients. J Neurosurg. 2000;93:183–193. doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.2.0183. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types