Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun 23;6(3):394-7.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0806. Epub 2010 Feb 3.

Vortex interactions with flapping wings and fins can be unpredictable

Affiliations

Vortex interactions with flapping wings and fins can be unpredictable

David Lentink et al. Biol Lett. .

Abstract

As they fly or swim, many animals generate a wake of vortices with their flapping fins and wings that reveals the dynamics of their locomotion. Previous studies have shown that the dynamic interaction of vortices in the wake with fins and wings can increase propulsive force. Here, we explore whether the dynamics of the vortex interactions could affect the predictability of propulsive forces. We studied the dynamics of the interactions between a symmetrically and periodically pitching and heaving foil and the vortices in its wake, in a soap-film tunnel. The phase-locked movie sequences reveal that abundant chaotic vortex-wake interactions occur at high Strouhal numbers. These high numbers are representative for the fins and wings of near-hovering animals. The chaotic wake limits the forecast horizon of the corresponding force and moment integrals. By contrast, we find periodic vortex wakes with an unlimited forecast horizon for the lower Strouhal numbers (0.2-0.4) at which many animals cruise. These findings suggest that swimming and flying animals could control the predictability of vortex-wake interactions, and the corresponding propulsive forces with their fins and wings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Phase-locked averages wake images reveal abundant chaotic vortex-wake interactions as a function of flapping foil kinematics; dimensionless heave amplitude A* and wavelength λ*, and pitch amplitude α0, which are illustrated in (a). (a) A* = 1; (b) A* = 2. Empty spaces represent αeff < 0° (no thrust) for which we made no measurements. White lines (dashed) indicate the borderline between chaotic and periodic flow according to λ* = 2π × A*/tan(50° + α0/4) (see text for definition). The blue bar under the figure indicates the range of λ* at which swimming and flying animals are known to cruise for the corresponding A* (which together build up the corresponding Strouhal number range).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(a) Phase-locked averages wake images for A* = 3 (figure 1). (b) Pooled normalized standard deviation of I0, I1,r and I2,r (with respect to maximum value) as a function of αind at constant α0 shows approximately exponential growth. Exponential fits from left to right for pooled I yield formula image (α0 = 0°; r2 = 0.95); formula image (α0 = 15°; r2 = 0.94); formula image (α0 = 30°; r2 = 0.92); formula image (α0 = 45°; r2 = 0.97); formula image (α0 = 60°; r2 = 0.91). (c) Standard deviation of I0 (outer circle), I1,r (middle circle), and I2,r, (inner circle) plotted as a function of αeff and αind, which are colour-coded from minimum to maximum/2; (0.4c)2s(I0) ≤ (2.6c)2; (1.2c)3s(I1,r) ≤ (4.1c)3; (2.1c)4s(I2,r) ≤ (5.6c)4. We find a periodic vortex-wake domain at low values of αind (which corresponds with Strouhal number) and a chaotic domain at high values (yellow area). The border between both domains can be described by αeff = 247° − 3.15αind and represents the left border of the yellow area (crosses indicated the calculated intersections in (b) to which the borderline is fitted). Animals preferably cruise at low Strouhal numbers St, in the range 0.2–0.4 (Taylor et al. 2003), for which we find solely periodic vortex-wake interactions.

References

    1. Alben S., Shelley M.2005Coherent locomotion as an attracting state for a free flapping body. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 102, 11 163–11 166 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0505064102) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blondeaux P., Guglielmini L., Triantafyllou M. S.2005Chaotic flow generated by an oscillating foil. AIAA J. 43, 918–922 (doi:10.2514/1.8042) - DOI
    1. Borazjani I., Sotiropoulos F.2008Numerical investigation of the hydrodynamics of carangiform swimming in the transitional and inertial flow regimes. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 1541–1558 (doi:10.1242/jeb.015644) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cerretelli C., Williamson C. H. K.2003The physical mechanism for vortex merging. J. Fluid Mech. 475, 41–77 (doi:10.1017/S0022112002002847) - DOI
    1. Dickinson M. H., Lehmann F. O., Sane S. P.1999Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science 284, 1954–1960 (doi:10.1126/science.284.5422.1954) - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources