Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar 1;184(5):2476-86.
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902876. Epub 2010 Feb 3.

The role of the LAT-PLC-gamma1 interaction in T regulatory cell function

Affiliations

The role of the LAT-PLC-gamma1 interaction in T regulatory cell function

Mariana I Chuck et al. J Immunol. .

Abstract

The interaction between the linker for activation of T cells (LAT) with PLC-gamma1 is important for TCR-mediated Ca(2+) signaling and MAPK activation. Knock-in mice harboring a mutation at the PLC-gamma1 binding site (Y136) of LAT develop a severe lymphoproliferative syndrome. These mice have defective thymic development and selection and lack natural regulatory T cells, implicating a breakdown of both central and peripheral tolerance. To bypass this developmental defect, we developed a conditional knock-in line in which only LATY136F is expressed in mature T cells after deletion of the wild type LAT allele. Analysis of LATY136F T cells indicated that the interaction between LAT and PLC-gamma1 plays an important role in TCR-mediated signaling, proliferation, and IL-2 production. Furthermore, the deletion of LAT induced development of the lymphoproliferative syndrome in these mice. Although Foxp3(+) natural Treg cells were present in these mice after deletion, they were unable to suppress the proliferation of conventional T cells. Our data indicate that the binding of LAT to PLC-gamma1 is essential for the suppressive function of CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. T cell development in ERCreLATf/m mice
(a-b) CD4 and CD8 expression on thymocytes (upper panel) and splenocytes (lower panel) from untreated (a) and tamoxifen-treated (b) ERCreLATf/m and ERCreLATf/+ littermates. (c) Efficient deletion of LAT after tamoxifen treatment. GFP expression on CD4+ T cells was analyzed. The shaded area represents CD4+ T cells from a C57BL/6 mouse. (d) Expression of CD4 and Foxp3 on GFP+ cells from the lymph nodes of ERCreLATf/m and ERCreLATf/+ littermates 4-5 days after tamoxifen treatment. Data shown are representative of three mice of each genotype.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Defective TCR-mediated signaling and function in mature ERCreLATf/m T cells
Analysis of T cells from ERCreLATf/m and ERCreLATf/+ mice 4-5 days after tamoxifen injections. (a) TCRβ expression on ERCreLATf/m (solid line) and ERCreLATf/+ (dotted line) in GFP+CD4+ lymph node cells. Shaded area represents TCRβ expression on B cells. (b)Western blot analysis showing total tyrosine phosphorylation in ERCreLATf/m and ERCreLATf/+ activated T cells after anti-CD3 stimulation. Data shown are a representative of 3 independent experiments. (c) Western blots showing phosphorylation of PLC-γ1 and Erk1/2. (d) Calcium flux in ERCreLATf/m (gray line) and ERCreLATf/+ (black line) GFP+CD4+ cells in response to TCR stimulation. (e) IL-2 production in ERCreLATf/m (filled bars) and ERCreLATf/+ (empty bars) CD4+ cells. The figure is a representative of 4 independent experiments. (f) Proliferation in ERCreLATf/m (filled bars) and ERCreLATf/+ (empty bars) CD4+ cells.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Recapitulation of the LATY136F phenotype in ERCreLATf/m mice 3 weeks after deletion of floxed LAT
Analysis of ERCreLATf/m and ERCreLATf/+ mice after 3-4 weeks of tamoxifen treatment. (a) CD4 and CD8 expression on GFP+ thymocytes from ERCreLATf/m and ERCreLATf/+ mice (upper panel). CD25 and CD44 expression profile on DN thymocytes (lower panel). (b) Total numbers of CD4+, CD8+ and B220+ cells in the spleens of ERCreLATf/m and ERCreLATf/+ mice. The figure shown is one representative of 5 mice analyzed. (c) CD4 vs CD8 (upper panel) and CD62L vs CD44 surface expression in GFP+CD4+ splenocytes. (d) Intracellular IL-4 expression in GFP+CD4+ splenocytes after P+I stimulation. The shaded area represents unstimulated controls. (e) Surface CD25 and intracellular Foxp3 expression in GFP+CD4+ lymph node cells.
Figure 4
Figure 4. The presence of hyper-activated ERCreLATf/m T cells in the periphery of reconstituted LAT−/− mice
Analysis of LAT−/− mice reconstituted with ERCreLATf/m or ERCreLATf/+ T cells and treated with tamoxifen for 4-5 weeks. (a) Total numbers of CD4+, CD8+ and B220+ cells in the spleen of tamoxifen treated LAT−/− recipients reconstituted with ERCreLATf/m or ERCreLATf/+ T cells. (b) CD4 and CD8 expression on splenocytes. 3 mice of each genotype were analyzed. Data shown is a representative of one of 4 such experiments. (c) TCRβ expression on GFP+ CD4+ cells in LAT−/− recipients that received cells from either ERCreLATf/m (solid line) or ERCreLATf/+ (dotted line). The shaded area represents a negative control. (d) IFN-γ, IL-2 and IL-4 production in GFP+CD4+ cells after P+I stimulation. Unstimulated controls (shaded area) and stimulated cells (solid line) are depicted. (e) B220 and MHC Class II expression on lymph node cells (top panel). IgD and IgM expression on B220+ cells (bottom panel). (f) Blood serum levels of IgE, IgG1 and IgM from LAT−/− recipients injected with T cells from ERCreLATf/m (squares) and ERCreLATf/+ (diamonds) mice.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Impaired suppressive function of ERCreLATf/mCD4+Foxp3+ cells
(a) CD25 and Foxp3 expression in CD4+GFP+ cells in ERCreLATf/m and ERCreLATf/+ mice 4 days after tamoxifen treatment (upper panel) and in LAT-/- mice reconstituted with ERCreLATf/m and ERCreLATf/+ T cells after 4 weeks of maintained tamoxifen treatment (lower panel). 3 mice were analyzed for each genotype. The figure shown is one representative of 4 experiments performed. (b) Total number of cells from the mesenteric, inguinal, brachial and axillary lymph nodes (left panel) and the spleen (right panel) of ERCreLATf/m and ERCreLATf/+ mice were analyzed 4 days after tamoxifen treatment. (c) In vitro suppression assay using various ratios of CD4+CD25 responder cells (R) to CD4+CD25+ suppressor cells (S) from ERCreLATf/m and ERCreLATf/+ mice 4-5 days after tamoxifen treatment. Proliferation of wildtype Thy1.1+CD4+CD25- responder cells is shown as indicated by CFSE dilution. The figure shown is one representative of 3 experiments performed. (d) Expression of IL-10 and TGFβ in ERCreLATf/m and ERCreLATf/+ CD4+CD25+ T cells after one hour of anti-CD3 stimulation. (e) CTLA-4 expression on GFP+CD4+Foxp3+ cells from the lymph nodes of ERCreLATf/m mice (solid line) and ERCreLATf/+ mice (dashed line) 4-5 days after tamoxifen treatment. GFP+CD4+Foxp3- cells were used as a control (filled area).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhang W, Sloan-Lancaster J, Kitchen J, Trible RP, Samelson LE. LAT: the ZAP-70 tyrosine kinase substrate that links T cell receptor to cellular activation. Cell. 1998;92:83–92. - PubMed
    1. Weber JR, Orstavik S, Torgersen KM, Danbolt NC, Berg SF, Ryan JC, Tasken K, Imboden JB, Vaage JT. Molecular cloning of the cDNA encoding pp36, a tyrosine-phosphorylated adaptor protein selectively expressed by T cells and natural killer cells. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1998;187:1157–1161. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang W, Irvin BJ, Trible RP, Abraham RT, Samelson LE. Functional analysis of LAT in TCR-mediated signaling pathways using a LAT-deficient Jurkat cell line. International immunology. 1999;11:943–950. - PubMed
    1. Zhang W, Trible RP, Zhu M, Liu SK, McGlade CJ, Samelson LE. Association of Grb2, Gads, and phospholipase C-gamma 1 with phosphorylated LAT tyrosine residues. Effect of LAT tyrosine mutations on T cell angigen receptor-mediated signaling. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2000;275:23355–23361. - PubMed
    1. Finco TS, Kadlecek T, Zhang W, Samelson LE, Weiss A. LAT is required for TCR-mediated activation of PLCgamma1 and the Ras pathway. Immunity. 1998;9:617–626. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms