Trends in risks associated with new drug development: success rates for investigational drugs
- PMID: 20130567
- DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2009.295
Trends in risks associated with new drug development: success rates for investigational drugs
Abstract
This study utilizes both public and private data sources to estimate clinical phase transition and clinical approval probabilities for drugs in the development pipelines of the 50 largest pharmaceutical firms (by sales). The study examined the development histories of these investigational compounds from the time point at which they first entered clinical testing (1993-2004) through June 2009. The clinical approval success rate in the United States was 16% for self-originated drugs (originating from the pharmaceutical company itself) during both the 1993-1998 and the 1999-2004 subperiods. For all compounds (including licensed-in and licensed-out drugs in addition to self-originated drugs), the clinical approval success rate for the entire study period was 19%. The estimated clinical approval success rates and phase transition probabilities differed significantly by therapeutic class. The estimated clinical approval success rate for self-originated compounds over the entire study period was 32% for large molecules and 13% for small molecules. The estimated transition probabilities were also higher for all clinical phases with respect to large molecules.
Similar articles
-
Pharmaceutical R&D performance by firm size: approval success rates and economic returns.Am J Ther. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):26-34. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e318269198f. Am J Ther. 2014. PMID: 23344103
-
Clinical approval success rates for investigational cancer drugs.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Sep;94(3):329-35. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2013.117. Epub 2013 Jun 5. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013. PMID: 23739536
-
Spending on new drug development1.Health Econ. 2010 Feb;19(2):130-41. doi: 10.1002/hec.1454. Health Econ. 2010. PMID: 19247981
-
The value of drug repositioning in the current pharmaceutical market.Drug News Perspect. 2009 Mar;22(2):119-25. doi: 10.1358/dnp.2009.22.2.1303818. Drug News Perspect. 2009. PMID: 19330170 Review.
-
Economics of new oncology drug development.J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jan 10;25(2):209-16. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0803. J Clin Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17210942 Review.
Cited by
-
Computationally designed peptide macrocycle inhibitors of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase 1.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 23;118(12):e2012800118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012800118. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021. PMID: 33723038 Free PMC article.
-
Exploratory Analysis of the Factors Associated With Success Rates of Confirmatory Randomized Controlled Trials in Cancer Drug Development.Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jan;14(1):260-267. doi: 10.1111/cts.12852. Epub 2020 Aug 21. Clin Transl Sci. 2021. PMID: 32702190 Free PMC article.
-
Drug-drug interaction studies: regulatory guidance and an industry perspective.AAPS J. 2013 Jul;15(3):629-45. doi: 10.1208/s12248-013-9470-x. Epub 2013 Mar 30. AAPS J. 2013. PMID: 23543602 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Expected Net Present Value of Developing Weight Management Drugs in the Context of Drug Safety Litigation.Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Jul;33(7):749-63. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0300-0. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015. PMID: 26054325
-
The Challenges and Opportunities Associated with Reimbursement for Obesity Pharmacotherapy in the USA.Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Jul;33(7):643-53. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0264-0. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015. PMID: 25686799 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources